SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Satish Chandra Sharma, Subramonium Prasad, JJ.
Abhishek Agarwal - Appellant
Versus
Union of India - Respondent
W.P.(C) 1793 of 2020 & CM Appl. 6242 of 2020
Decided On : 09-12-2022




The constitutional validity of the New Delhi International Arbitration Centre Act, 2019 was upheld, emphasizing legislative safeguards for arbitrator independence and impartiality while dismissing concerns of governmental bias.

Headnote:(A) New Delhi International Arbitration Centre Act, 2019 - Section 5 - Constitutionality challenged - The Act creates an independent regime for arbitration, with members appointed to insulate the Centre from biases. Section 12(3)(a) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Independence of arbitrators. (Paras 5, 9, 10)

(B) Legislative Presumption - Acts are presumed constitutional unless a clear violation of provisions is demonstrated. The court ruled that apprehensions of bias are not sufficient for declaring legislation unconstitutional. (Paras 8, 11, 21)

(C) Procedural Integrity - The Centre's mechanisms for arbitrator appointment are designed to ensure impartiality, without direct government interference in arbitral matters. (Paras 10, 20)

Facts of the case:
A Public Interest Litigation filed by a lawyer challenges the composition of members in the New Delhi International Arbitration Centre, arguing it undermines impartiality due to government influence.

Findings of Court:
The Act does not violate fundamental rights and includes provisions to enhance independence and impartiality, dismissing the PIL.

Issues: Whether Section 5 violates the independence and impartiality required for arbitrators and if legislative scrutiny is adequate to mitigate bias.

Ratio Decidendi: The court concluded that the legislative framework ensures adequate safeguards against bias and upholds the constitutional validity of the impugned Section.

Result: Writ Petition dismissed.

JUDGMENT

1. The instant Public Interest Litigation has been filed by one, Mr. Abhishek Kumar, a Lawyer, challenging the constitutional validity of Section 5 (`Impugned Section') of the New Delhi International Arbitration Centre Act, 2019 (`Act').

2. The Act was promulgated on 26.07.2019 and came into force from 02.03.2019. The Act envisages the creation of New Delhi International Arbitration Centre (`NDIAC/Centre'). The purpose of the Act is to create an independent and autonomous regime for institutionalised arbitration. The Act is also meant for revamping the pre-existing International Centre for Alternate Dispute Resolution and to utilise its infrastructure, and other facilitates.

3. The Impugned Section deals with the composition of members of the Centre, and their appointment. It reads as under:

    "5. The Centre shall consist of the following Members, namely:

    (a) a person, who has been a Judge of the Supreme Court or a Judge of a High Court or an eminent person, having special knowledge and experience in the conduct or administration of arbitration law or management, appointed by the Central Government in consultation with the Chief Justice of India--- Chairperson;

    (b) two eminent persons having substantial knowledge and experience in institutional arbitration, both domestic and international, appointed by the Central Government--Full-time or Part-time Members;

    (c) one representative of a recognised body of commerce and industry, chosen on rotational basis by the Central Government--Part-time Member;

    (d) Secretary, Department of Legal Affairs Ministry of Law and Justice or his representative, not below the rank of the Joint Secretary--Member, ex officio

    (e) one Financial Adviser nominated by the Department of Expenditure Ministry of Finance-- Member, ex officio; and

    (f) Chief Executive Officer--Member, ex officio."

4. Section 14 of the Act empowers the Centre to maintain a panel of accredited arbitrators, conciliators, and mediators. Section 28 of the Act lays down the procedure for the empanelment of such arbitrators, in the following manner:

    "14. The objects of the Centre shall be--

    (a) to bring targeted reforms to develop itself as a flagship institution for conducting international and domestic arbitration;

    (b) to promote research and study, providing teaching and training, and organising conferences and seminars in arbitration, conciliation, mediation and other alternative dispute resolution matters;

    (c) to provide facilities and administrative assistance for conciliation, mediation and arbitral proceedings;

    (d) to maintain panels of accredited arbitrators, conciliators and mediators both at national and international level or specialists such as surveyors and investigators;

    (e) to collaborate with other national and international institutions and organisations for ensuring credibility of the Centre as a specialised institution in arbitration and conciliation;

    (f) to set-up facilities in India and abroad to promote the activities of the Centre;

    (g) to lay down parameters for different modes of alternative dispute resolution mechanisms being adopted by the Centre; and

    (i) such other objectives as it may deem fit with the approval of the Central Government.

    xxx

    28. (1) The Centre shall, establish a Chamber of Arbitration which shall empanel the Arbitrators and also scrutinise the applications for admission in the panel of reputed arbitrators to maintain a permanent panel of arbitration.

    (2) The Chamber of Arbitration shall consist of experienced arbitration practitioners of repute, at national and international level and persons having wide experience in the area of alternative dispute resolution and conciliation.

    (3) The Centre shall by regulations lay down the criteria for admission to the panel of the cadre so as to maintain a pool of reputed arbitrators having expertise in international commercial arbitration and arbitration other than international commercial arbitration.

    (4) The Registrar to the Secretariat

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top