SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
CHANDRA DHARI SINGH
H.QR.P. Limited – Appellant
Versus
M.T.I Limited – Respondent


Table of Content
1. application for stay of suit based on multiple pending matters. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. arguments over potential delay and validity of stay plea. (Para 4 , 5)
3. court's intent to carefully consider submissions. (Para 6)
4. essentials for invoking section 10 of cpc. (Para 7 , 8)
5. judicial precedents on preventing multiplicity of suits. (Para 9 , 10)
6. meaning of 'directly and substantially in issue'. (Para 11 , 13)
7. court's findings on issues not satisfying section 10. (Para 12 , 14 , 15 , 16)
8. dismissal of the application with final order. (Para 17 , 18)

ORDER

Chandra Dhari Singh, J. (Oral) I.A. 4662/2013

1. By way of this application, the defendants no. 11, 12, 20 to 22, 26 to 28 (hereinafter referred to as the `applicants') prays for the stay of the captioned suit, in accordance with Section 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as `the Code') inter alia with the following reliefs:

    "It is prayed that this Hon'ble Court is pleased to stay the present suit qua defendants No. 11, 12, 20 to 22 and 26 to 28.

    Any other order as may be deemed fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case, may also be passed in favour of said defend

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top