Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
NAJMI WAZIRI, VIKAS MAHAJAN
Tejpal Singh – Appellant
Versus
Surinder Kumar Dewan – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of arbitration appeal background (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. challenge of authenticity of collaboration agreements (Para 3 , 9 , 12) |
| 3. details of collaboration agreements (Para 4 , 5 , 11) |
| 4. unauthorized construction issue (Para 6 , 7) |
| 5. claims made by respondent in arbitration (Para 8 , 10) |
| 6. findings and modifications by the learned single judge (Para 13 , 14) |
| 7. arguments against claim b regarding deprivation (Para 18 , 19 , 22) |
| 8. damages awarded for mental agony (Para 23 , 26 , 27) |
| 9. final ruling on appeal (Para 28 , 29) |
JUDGMENT
Vikas Mahajan, J. This appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (in short `the Act') is directed against the impugned judgment and order dated 09.08.2018 passed by the learned Single Judge in OMP (COMM.) 178/2018, whereby the learned single judge has partially modified the award to the extent that amount awarded in favor of the respondent under Claim (A) was set aside and the amount awarded under Claim (B) was restricted to Rs.35,000/- per month for the period from May 2006 to 11.05.2007 along with interest as awarded by the learned Arbitrator. The remaining directions in the impugned award were upheld.
2. Wh
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
