IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
C. Hari Shankar, J.
Hind Samachar Limited - Appellant
Versus
Punjab Kesari Publishers Pvt. Ltd. - Respondent
C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 285 of 2021 & I.A. 21222 of 2022
Decided On : 14-12-2022
C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 285/2021 & I.A. 21222/2022
1. By this application, preferred under Sections 47 and 57 of the Trade Marks Act 1999, the plaintiff "The Hind Samachar Limited" has sought rectification of the registration of the Trade Marks maintained by the Registrar of Trademarks, by cancelling the registration granted by the Registry to Respondent 1 (the only contesting respondent) of the trade mark no. 3353424 dated 2nd September 2016 and to remove the said trade mark from the Registry of Trademarks.
2. This is a dispute amongst family members. During the pendency of the present petition, an oral Family Settlement was arrived at between the family members, which was reduced into writing, vide the Memorandum dated 16th July 2022, which has been placed on record along with IA 21222/2022.
3. Paras 9.1 and 9.2 of the said Family Settlement demarcated the territories in which the Petitioner (VKC group) and Respondent 1 (AKC group) could use the subject mark, and read thus:
"9.1. AKC Group Parties shall retain the exclusive right, title and ownership in trade mark ''PUNJAB KESARI" and/or ''DAILY PUNJAB KESARI" along with exclusive publication and printing rights to the title 'PUNJAB KESARJ' and/or ''DAILY PUNJAB KESARI" in respect to their territories namely Delhi, Utttakhand, Madhya Pradesh, Chattisgarh, Assqm, Gujarat, Haryana (only in Bhiwani, Faridabad, Gurgaon, Mahindragarh and Rewari districts) and the districts of Uttar Pradesh mentioned hereinafter Saharanpur, Muzaffarangar, Meerut, Bijnor Ghaziabad, Moradabad, Pilibhit, Rampur, Bareilly, Bulandshahr, Badaun, Shahjahanpur, Kheri, Aligarh, Etah, Sitapur, Bahraich, Mathura, Agra, Mainpur, Farrukhabad, Hardoi& Lucknow. (as existing in the year 2000 and their subdivision since then). In other words the present day divisions of Uttar Pradesh as follows: Agra, Aligarh, Ayodhya, Bareilly, Lucknow, Meerut, Mirzapur, Moradabad & Saharanpur.
9.2 VKC Group Parties shall retain the exclusive right, title and trademark to "PUNJAB KESARI" and/or "DAILY PUNJABKESARI" along with exclusive publication and printing rights to the title 'PUNJAB KESARI' and/or "DAILYPUNJABKESARI" in respect of their territories of Punjab, Haryana (except Bhiwani, Mahindragarh, Gurgaon, Faridabad and Rewari districts), Himachal Pradesh, Jammuand Kashmir, Ladakh, Chandigarh, Bihar, Jharkhand, West Bengal, Maharashtra, Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, Orissa, Kerala, Nepal and the districts of Uttar Pradesh mentioned hereafter: Etawah, Kanpur rural, Kanpur Urban, Unnao,Barabanki, Gonda, Basti, Gorakhpur, Deoria, Faizabad, Azamgarh, Jaunpur, Ballia, Ghazipur, Sultanpur, Mirzapur, Varanasi, Allahabad, Pratapgarh, Rae. Bareilly, Fatehpur,Banda, Hamirpur, Jalaun, Jhansi & Lalitpur (as existing in the year 2000 and their sub-division since then). In other words the present day divisions of Uttar Pradesh as follows: Devipatan, Basti, Gorakhpur, Kanpur, Azamgarh, Jhansi, Chitrakoot, Prayagraj & Varanasi"
4. IA 21222/2022, therefore, seeks that CO (COMM.IPD-TM) 285/2021 be disposed of in terms of the aforesaid Memorandum dated 16th July 2022, by directing rectification of the Register of Trade Marks in respect of Trademark No. 3353424 dated 2nd September 2016 by restricting the said trade mark in favour of Respondent 1 for the territories of Delhi, Uttarakhand, Madhya Pradesh, Chattisgarh, Assam, Gujarat, Haryana (only in Bhiwani, Faridabad, Gurgaon, Mahindragarh and Rewari districts) and in Uttar Pradesh mentioned hereinafter Saharanpur, Muzaffarangar, Meerut, Bijnor Ghaziabad, Moradabad, Pilibhit, Rampur, Bareilly, Bulandshahr, Badaun, Shahjahanpur, Kheri, Aligarh, Etah, Sitapur, Bahraich, Mathura, Agra, Mainpur, Farrukhabad, Hardoi & Lucknow districts (as existing in the year 2000 and their subdivision since then). And the present day divisions of Uttar Pradesh, which are, as follows: Agra, Aligarh, Ayodhya, Bareilly, Lucknow, Meerut, Mirzapur, Moradabad & Saharanpur and in respect of th
Trademark registrations can be rectified according to the terms of a family settlement, delineating territorial rights effectively between contesting parties.
The court prioritized peaceful resolution and familial harmony in disposing of the petitions seeking rectification of the register of Trade Marks.
The court emphasized the need for expeditious and meaningful disposal of proceedings, especially in matters relating to intellectual property rights.
Settlement of disputes and acknowledgment of terms of settlement by the parties can lead to the court decreeing the suit in favor of the settling party.
The court upheld the legality and regularity of the settlement agreement, leading to the decree in terms of the agreement.
Settlement-based withdrawal of trade mark cancellation petition upheld with directions for amendment processing.
The court applied Order XXIII Rule 3 of the CPC to decree the suit in terms of the settlement reached between the parties.
The combination of common words can be distinctive and unique as a trade mark, and the appellate forum has a limited role and cannot entertain new issues or documents at the appellate stage.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.