SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
DINESH KUMAR SHARMA
Ashu Gautam – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J. (Oral)

1. Present bail application has been moved in case FIR No.0248/2022 registered under Section 376/328/506/509 IPC. The proceedings emanated on the statement of the prosecutrix wherein she has alleged that though she was married in 2008 but the marriage did not succeed and she started living with her mother along with the children. The prosecutrix has alleged that she had a chance meeting the petitioner. The petitioner misrepresented to marry her and, on this misrepresentation, established physical relations with her several times. It is alleged that the physical relations were made at a hotel in Paharganj forcibly. The complainant has also alleged that the petitioner had extended threats to kill her. After investigation, the charge-sheet was filed under Section 376/328/506/509/34 IPC. The petitioner is in custody since 19.05.2022. Learned counsel submits that this is a false case made against him. He submits that even as per the case of the prosecutrix, she was already married and therefore there could not be any false representation of marriage.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that as per charge- sheet filed, the petit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top