DELHI HIGH COURT
DINESH KUMAR SHARMA
Ashu Gautam – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J. (Oral)
1. Present bail application has been moved in case FIR No.0248/2022 registered under Section 376/328/506/509 IPC. The proceedings emanated on the statement of the prosecutrix wherein she has alleged that though she was married in 2008 but the marriage did not succeed and she started living with her mother along with the children. The prosecutrix has alleged that she had a chance meeting the petitioner. The petitioner misrepresented to marry her and, on this misrepresentation, established physical relations with her several times. It is alleged that the physical relations were made at a hotel in Paharganj forcibly. The complainant has also alleged that the petitioner had extended threats to kill her. After investigation, the charge-sheet was filed under Section 376/328/506/509/34 IPC. The petitioner is in custody since 19.05.2022. Learned counsel submits that this is a false case made against him. He submits that even as per the case of the prosecutrix, she was already married and therefore there could not be any false representation of marriage.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that as per charge- sheet filed, the petit
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.