Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
MANOJ KUMAR OHRI
Bahai House of Worship – Appellant
Versus
Munisha – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. employment and death details of mohd. iqrar. (Para 1 , 7) |
| 2. dispute over employment status during death. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. interpretation of ec act as welfare legislation. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 4. death during employment confirmed despite absence. (Para 8) |
| 5. appeal dismissed; compensation to be released. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
JUDGMENT
Manoj Kumar Ohri, J. (ORAL)
1. By way of the present appeal filed under Section 30 of the Employees' Compensation Act, 1923 (hereinafter, referred to as the `EC Act'), the appellant has assailed the order dated 08.06.2018 passed by the learned Commissioner, Employees' Compensation (South District), Delhi in Case No. CEC/SD/D/20/2017/407.
2. Learned counsel for the appellant contended that though Mohd. Iqrar (the deceased) was employed with the appellant at the time of the incident, however the Tribunal erred in arriving at a conclusion that his death had occurred during the course of employment. In support of his contention, learned counsel has referred to the attendance register of the deceased for the month of September, 2015 wherein his attendance is marked only upto 24.09.2015. It is contended that the deceased had remained absent on 25/
The scope of interference in an appeal under the Employees' Compensation Act is limited to substantial questions of law, and findings of fact proved either way are not likely to be interfered with.
The central legal point established in the judgment is that in cases of disputed liability, the party should be granted an opportunity to lead evidence and cross-examine to prevent a miscarriage of j....
Labour statutes like the EC Act should be liberally construed in favor of employees for their welfare.
The limited scope of interference in appeals filed under Section 30 of the Employees' Compensation Act and the material issues that arise for the just decision of the Commissioner in a claim petition....
The court emphasized the need for evidence to prove material issues in a claim petition and the limited scope of interference in an appeal under Section 30 of the Employees' Compensation Act, 1923.
The appellate jurisdiction of the High Court under Section 30 of the Act is confined only to examine substantial questions of law, and findings of facts proved either way are not to be likely interfe....
The legal principle established in the judgment emphasizes the limited scope of interference in appeals under Section 30 of the Employees Compensation Act and the importance of evidence in establishi....
The appellate jurisdiction of the High Court in an appeal under Section 30 of the Employees' Compensation Act is confined only to examine substantial questions of law, and findings of fact proved eit....
The employer-employee relationship must be established with evidence, and familial ties do not undermine this if supported by admissions.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
