Back
MANOJ KUMAR OHRI
Baby Kaur – Appellant
Versus
Mohd. Umar – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Manoj Kumar Ohri, J. (Oral)
1. Present none for the respondents.
2. It is noted that respondents stand served, however, none has appeared on their behalf on the last two dates of hearing.
3. By way of the present appeal filed under Section 30 of the Employees' Compensation Act, 1923 (hereinafter, referred to as the 'EC Act'), the appellants have assailed the order dated 06.03.2018/09.03.2018 passed by the learned Commissioner, Employees' Compensation, District North-West, Delhi in Case No.WCD/24/WD/17/177.
4. Mr. R.K. Nain, learned counsel for the appellants, submits that in the present appeal, the appellants have not only assailed order dated 06.03.2018/09.03.2018, but also the order dated 17.08.2017, vide which the claim petition filed by the claimants was dismissed as withdrawn without any liberty to file a fresh case. He further submits that vide the impugned order dated 06.03.2018/09.03.2018, learned Commissioner dismissed the claim petition for 'non-pursuit' and prays that the matter may be remanded back for consideration on merits.
5. I have heard learned counsel for the appellants and gone through the entire case record.
6. A perusal of the record would show t
Labour statutes like the EC Act should be liberally construed in favor of employees for their welfare.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of citing reasons in an order, the beneficial nature of the Employees' Compensation Act, and the need to interpret its provisions in....
Object for enacting Employees' Compensation Act even as early as 1923 was to ameliorate hardship of economically poor employees.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of providing reasons in orders, granting liberty when allowing withdrawal of claim petitions, and interpreting labor statutes as ben....
The Employees' Compensation Act mandates liberal construction for worker welfare, affirming that death from medical emergencies at the workplace is compensable regardless of attendance irregularities....
A claim deemed non-maintainable due to statutory provisions prevents the adjudicating authority from making further observations on merits; such findings are considered extraneous and non-binding.
The scope of interference in an appeal under the Employees' Compensation Act is limited to substantial questions of law, and findings of fact proved either way are not likely to be interfered with.
The court emphasized the liberal construction of labour statutes in favor of employees and the need to protect workmen from accidents at their place of work.
The central legal point established in the judgment is that in cases of disputed liability, the party should be granted an opportunity to lead evidence and cross-examine to prevent a miscarriage of j....
The limited scope of interference in appeals filed under Section 30 of the Employees' Compensation Act and the material issues that arise for the just decision of the Commissioner in a claim petition....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
