Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI
Extramarks Education India Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Ram School – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks arbitration for disputes. (Para 1 , 2 , 4 , 6) |
| 2. court analyzes arbitration agreement and limitations. (Para 3 , 8 , 11 , 12 , 14 , 15 , 19) |
| 3. respondents argue claims are time-barred. (Para 5 , 7 , 9) |
| 4. doctrine of limitation restricts legal remedies. (Para 13 , 17) |
| 5. petition dismissed for being time-barred. (Para 20 , 21 , 22) |
JUDGMENT
Anup Jairam Bhambhani, J. (ORAL)
By way of the present petition under section 11 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act 1996 (`A&C Act' for short), the petitioner seeks appointment of an arbitrator to adjudicate upon the disputes that are stated to have arisen with the respondent from Agreement dated 02.05.2014 (`Agreement' for short), which related to the sale, implementation and installation by the petitioner of certain hardware and multi-media system accessories along with software for the purpose of setting-up 24 Smart Learn Classes at several schools run by the respondents.
2. Notice on this petition was issued on 25.01.2022.
3. Mr. Zeeshan Hashmi, learned counsel for the petitioner has drawn the attention of this court to clause 11 of the Agreement which comprises the arbitration agreement between the pa
Claims must be filed within the prescribed limitation period, and failure to do so renders them time-barred and non-arbitrable.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the distinction between jurisdictional and admissibility issues in arbitration, the application of limitation under Article 137 of the Limitation A....
The issue of limitation is a matter for the Arbitrator to decide, and disputes should be referred to the Arbitrator for resolution.
An application under Section 11 for appointment of an arbitrator is time-barred if filed after three years from the refusal to appoint, with delays not justified.
Arbitration requests must be filed within three years of the cause of action; failure to act in time bars subsequent petitions.
(1) Appointment of Arbitrator – Limitation – There is a fine distinction between plea that claims raised are barred by limitation and plea that application for appointment of Arbitrator is barred by ....
The court ruled that a notice invoking arbitration is deemed served if dispatched to the correct address, and disputes cannot be dismissed on limitation grounds when evidence suggests ongoing acknowl....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
