JUDGMENT :

1. The instant arbitration application has been filed by the applicant-Firm under Sections 10 & 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as ‘Act of 1996’) claiming the following reliefs:-

vr% izkFkZuk i= izLrqr dj fuosnu gS fd blesa mYysf[kr fooknksa ds fuiVkjs ds fy, fn vkchZVsª'ku ,.M dksUlhfy;s'ku ,DV 1996 dh /kkjk 10 o 11 ds izko/kku vuqlkj dh fu;qfDr ds vkns'k tkjh Qjek;k tkos A izkFkhZ dk ;g fuosnu Hkh gS fd bl dkj.k dh vizkFkhZx.k us vius vkpj.k ls e/;LFk fu;qfDr dk viuk vf/kdkj [kks fn;k gS A vr% fdlh lsok fuo`r HkV~Vs ds dk;ksZ esa n{krk j[kus okys Lora= ,oa fu"i{k v/kh{k.k vfHk;ark o bl ls mPp inLFk vf/kdkjh dh e/;LFk ds :i esa fu;qfDr ekuuh; mPp U;k;ky; }kjk dh tkos A

2. The applicant is the partnership Firm, who entered into an agreement with the respondent pertaining to the works pertaining to brick kiln ¼bZaV HkV~Vk½ to be done from 25.04.1996 to 24.04.1997; thereafter, the work order was issued on 10.04.1996. However, the respondent did not make the necessary pending payments to the applicant against the works so done by it. In pursuance of the letters dated 26.05.2020 and 17.07.2020 under the Right to Information Act, 2005,