SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MINI PUSHKARNA
Asian Hotels (North) Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Sital Dass Sons – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Mini Pushkarna, J.

1. The present appeals have been filed under Section 37(2)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter called "the Act") against the common order dated 23.04.2022 passed by the Arbitral Tribunal disposing of the applications filed under Section 17 of the Act on behalf of appellant and respondents respectively, seeking interim measures.

2. The disputes between the parties relate to the revocation of the licence agreement of the respondents by the appellant. The present appeals deal with different shops situated in the premises of the appellant's hotel, details of which are given herein below:

(i) Arb. A (COMM) 48/2022- Shop No. L-79, Shopping arcade, Hotel Hyatt Regency, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi

(ii) Arb. A (COMM) 49/2022- Shop No. L-78, Shopping arcade, Hotel Hyatt Regency, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi

(iii) Arb. A (COMM) 50/2022- Shop No. L-73, Shopping arcade, Hotel Hyatt Regency, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi

(iv) Arb. A (COMM) 51/2022- Shop No. L-81, Shopping arcade, Hotel Hyatt Regency, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi

3. The appellant and respondents entered into unregistered licence agreements/Supplementary Agreements as

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top