Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
MINI PUSHKARNA
Asian Hotels (North) Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Sital Dass Sons – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. formation and conditions of license agreements (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. revocation process and parties' initial actions (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. judicial outcomes and interim arrangements (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. roles of parties during arbitration (Para 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 5. appellant's arguments for repair and restoration (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 6. respondents' response to appellant's actions (Para 26 , 34 , 35) |
| 7. interim relief considerations (Para 39 , 42 , 43) |
| 8. final order and directive outcomes (Para 50 , 51) |
JUDGMENT
Mini Pushkarna, J.
1. The present appeals have been filed under Section 37(2)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter called "the Act") against the common order dated 23.04.2022 passed by the Arbitral Tribunal disposing of the applications filed under Section 17 of the Act on behalf of appellant and respondents respectively, seeking interim measures.
2. The disputes between the parties relate to the revocation of the licence agreement of the respondents by the appellant. The present appeals deal with different shops situated in the premises of the appellant's hotel, details of which are given herein below:
(i) Arb. A
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
