SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
VIBHU BAKHRU, PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
Deepjot Singh Anand – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Table of Content
1. details of land acquisition and compensation dispute (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. appellant's challenge to lower court's decision (Para 7 , 8)
3. discussion on maintainability of appeal under cpc section 100a (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17)
4. final decision on maintainability of the appeal (Para 18)

JUDGMENT

Vibhu Bakhru, J. The appellant has filed the present appeal impugning an order dated 30.05.2019 (hereafter `the impugned order') passed by the learned Single Judge in L.A. APP.179/2016 captioned Deepjot Singh v Union of India & Anr.. The said appeal was preferred by the appellant against the order dated 10.05.2016 passed by the learned Additional District Judge in a reference made at the instance of the appellant, under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereafter `the Act') being LAC No.8/10/01 captioned Deepot Singh v. Union of India.

2. The Government of NCT of Delhi had acquired the land admeasuring 156 bigha 15 biswas in Village Tikri Kalan, Delhi. The notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereafter `the Act') in respect of the said acquisition was issued on 12.08.1997. This was followed by a notifi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top