SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DINESH KUMAR SHARMA
Raju – Appellant
Versus
State Govt. of N.C.T of Delhi – Respondent


Table of Content
1. quashing of firs due to mutual settlements. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. inherent powers of high court under section 482 cr.p.c. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
3. case disposed of and fir quashed. (Para 10 , 11)

JUDGMENT

Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J. (Oral)

CRL.M.A. 39/2023 (Exemption)

Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions.

CRL.M.C. 14/2023

1. The present petition has been filed seeking quashing of FIR No. 377/2018 registered at PS Mayur Vihar under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC.

2. Brief facts of the case are that petitioner no. 1 was married to respondent no. 2/complainant namely Ms. Ankita on 15th February, 2015. No child was born out of this wedlock. However, owing to temperamental differences both parties started residing separately since11th March, 2018. Subsequently, on 10.10.2018, F.I.R. No.377/2018 under section 498A/406/34 IPC, P.S. Mayur Vihar Ph-I, District East, Delhi was registered against the petitioners on the basis of the complaint filed by respondent no.2.

3. Learned Counsel for the petitioner has sought to quash of the above mentioned FIR on the ground that during the pendency of the divorce proceedings, respondent no. 2/complainant along with the p

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top