Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Suresh Kumar Kait, Neena Bansal Krishna, JJ.
Amarpal Singh - Appellant
Versus
Union of India - Respondent
W.P.(C) 132 of 2023
Decided On : 06-01-2023
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's request for training allowance. (Para 1 , 1) |
| 2. failure to respond to petitioner's representation. (Para 2) |
| 3. court directs resolution of representation. (Para 3) |
| 4. provision for appeal if aggrieved. (Para 4) |
| 5. final disposal of the petition. (Para 5) |
1. The petitioner in his petition has made following prayer:
a) To direct the respondents DG CRPF to grant Training Allowance to the petitioner in terms of DOPT OM dated 24.10.2017.
b) To direct the respondents DG CRPF to grant arrear of the Training Allowance from the date of joining of the petitioners in the RTC Srinagar, CRPF.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for the issues raised in the present petition, the petitioner has made a representation dated 06.08.2022 to the respondents. However, the same has not been decided.
3. We hereby dispose of the present petition directing the respondents to decide the representation dated 06.08.2022 within four weeks and the decision of the same shall be communicated to the petitioner in writing within one week thereafter.
4. Needless to say that if the petitioner still aggrieved, he may challenge the same before the appropriate Court.
5. The petition is accordingly disposed of.
The court obliges timely resolution of pending representations to ensure administrative accountability in granting allowances, referencing procedural directives.
Timely adjudication of representation seeking refixation of seniority.
The court emphasized the importance of timely adjudication of representations under Article 226 and issued a writ of mandamus to ensure the same.
Timely decision-making on representations filed by employees in employment disputes is essential, and the court has the authority to direct the respondents to decide such representations within a spe....
The court directed timely resolution of pending petitions, emphasizing the importance of administrative efficiency in handling mercy petitions.
The main legal point established is the requirement for the competent authority to decide the petitioner's representation regarding seniority within a specified timeframe and communicate the decision....
The court emphasized the importance of timely decision-making on representations made by petitioners.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
