Back
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, TUSHAR RAO GEDELA
General Manager Northern Railway – Appellant
Versus
Pioneer Publicity Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the case. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. parties' contentions regarding site availability. (Para 8 , 10 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 3. court's analysis and reasoning concerning the award. (Para 9 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 26 , 27 , 30 , 31 , 33) |
| 4. legal interpretation of patent illegality. (Para 25 , 28 , 29 , 32) |
| 5. final conclusion and dismissal of appeal. (Para 34 , 35) |
JUDGMENT
Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. Appellant by way of this Appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Arbitration Act) impugns Judgment dated 01.06.2022, whereby the Objections filed by the Appellant under section 34 of the Arbitration Act against the Interim Award III dated 29.10.2012 have been dismissed.
2. By way of Commercial Circular No. 36 of 2006 dated 01.05.2006, the Railway Board announced its intention to implement its scheme of awarding sole rights for commercial publicity on nominated divisions of the Railways to individual parties.
3. In pursuance thereof, a Notice Inviting Tender was issued by the Railways in December 2006, inviting tenders for commercial publicity in the Delhi Division
The court upheld the arbitrator's ruling that the appellant was contractually required to provide the entire advertising area for the duration of the contract, emphasizing limited grounds for judicia....
The contract mandated the Railways provide specified advertising space to PPC, introducing a duty to refund unprovided areas and uphold terms allowing equivalent replacements at no additional cost.
Judicial review under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act is limited to assessing non-compliance with public policy or blatant errors; arbitral awards will not be disturbed unless they....
The interpretation of 'as is where is' clause does not absolve the vendor of responsibility for delivering an operational property; oral assurances prior to contract affect enforceability.
Arbitral award in MSME dispute upheld absent patent illegality; limitation from last partial payment; office bearers liable as representatives; higher publication rate inferred from substantial payme....
Point of law: Arbitration Award - It must clearly be understood that when a court is applying the "public policy" test to an arbitration award, it does not act as a court of appeal and consequently e....
Court highlighted that interference with arbitral awards is limited, asserting that awards cannot be set aside merely due to merits but only if arbitrary, confirming the Arbitral Tribunal's authority....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
