SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Del) 306

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
NAVIN CHAWLA, SHALINDER KAUR, JJ.
Seema Jamwal - Petitioner
Versus
Union Of India And Ors - Respondents
W.P.(C) 9319 of 2022
Decided on : 17-01-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Adv.
For the Respondent: Mr. Anshuman, SPC, Mr.Gokul Sharma, Mr. Piyush Ahluwalia, Advs

The court held that a police officer's death due to cardiac issues while on duty in a high altitude area was attributable to service conditions, entitling the widow to Extraordinary Pension and ex-gratia compensation.

Headnote:

(A) Article 226 of the Constitution of India - Writ petition for quashing of order rejecting claim for benefits due to death of a police officer on duty - Claim for Extraordinary Pension and ex-gratia compensation - Court held that the death was attributable to service conditions and granted compensation as per Government rules. (Paras 27, 28, 29)

(B) Death due to natural causes - Court clarified that chronic ailments are not covered under service conditions unless linked to duty - Delay in medical attention was a critical factor. (Paras 19, 20)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, widow of Inspector Bhagmal Jamwal, sought relief for benefits following her husband's death attributed to service conditions while on duty in a high altitude area. (Paras 1, 2)

Findings of Court:
The court found that the deceased's death was attributable to service conditions, allowing the petitioner's claims for Extraordinary Pension and ex-gratia compensation. (Paras 23, 26)

Issues: The main issues were whether the cause of death could be considered attributable to service conditions and the entitlement to Extraordinary Pension and ex-gratia compensation. (Paras 14, 15)

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the deceased's death was due to conditions related to his service, emphasizing the importance of timely medical attention and the connection between service and the cause of death. (Paras 19, 23)

Result: Writ petition allowed; respondents directed to grant benefits. (Paras 27, 30)

JUDGMENT : 

SHALINDER KAUR, J.

1. The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the widow of late Inspector (General Duty), Bhagmal Jamwal, who unfortunately passed away while serving with the 54th Battalion (Bn.) in the Indo-Tibetan Border Police Force (ITBPF), seeking the following reliefs:

i) To issue a writ of certiorari for quashing of the order dated 24.12.2021 whereby the Legal notice dated 08.10.2021 has been arbitrarily rejected by the Respondents.

ii) To issue a writ of mandamus directing the  Respondents to grant the benefits of Ex-gratia lump sum amount of Rs.35 lakh and extra ordinary pension as per Rule 3-A of the CCS (EOP) Rules along with arrears and interest in favour of the Petitioner considering the death of her husband whilst being on active duty at high altitude area of Arunachal Pradesh as per the policies in vogue.

2. The following factual narration unravel the raison d'etre for filing the present petition:

a. The Shri Bhagmal Jamwal, late husband of the petitioner, (hereinafter referred to as the ‘deceased’) joined the ITBPF as a Constable (GD) on 06.11.1980 and gained various promotions during his service. He was ultimately promoted to the rank of Inspector (GD) on 23.06.2011, the post he was serving at the time of his demise.

b. During his career, which spanned over three decades, the deceased had served at various stations, including various Extreme Hard Areas such as Sirahan, Kinnaur in Himachal Pradesh; Gauchar in Uttrakhand; Srinagar in Jammu & Kashmir; Leh & Ladakh on two separate occasions, as also other Hard Areas in the North East, that is, Sikkim and Arunachal Pradesh. Apart from his abovementioned postings, he was also, from time to time, an Instructor at the Basic Training Centre of ITBPF.

c. While he was posted with the 54th Bn. of the ITBPF at Ziro, District Lower Subansiri, Arunachal Pradesh, for Border Guarding Duty in 2016, the deceased, on 14.03.2016, experienced a sharp pain in his chest. However, at the said time, he did not pay any heed to the pain as he thought the same was a result of a muscle pull/spasm while playing badminton. As the pain did not subside but had also spread to his back, the deceased reported the same to his superiors. They, thereafter, directed that he be taken to the District Hospital Ziro, Arunachal Pradesh, where he was examined, and the ECG report revealed that his heart was in a poor condition and he required urgent and immediate medical attention. He was referred to the Government Medical College, Guwahati, Assam for further medical treatment.

d. Despite his ailment warranting urgent treatment, the deceased was taken to Naharlagun in an ITBPF vehicle, which was the closest Railway Station, being situated four hours away from Ziro. From there, he took an overnight train to Guwahati, where upon his arrival, he was first taken to the ITBPF Transit Camp and thereafter to the Government Medical College, Guwahati.

e. The deceased succumbed to his cardiac condition and passed away on 18.03.2016. The cause of death was ascertained as“acute  anterior wall my cordial infraction with complete heart block with cardogenic shock with acute kidney injury and coronary artery diseases tripal vessel disease.”

f. Thereafter, since the petitioner had not received complete information pertaining to her husband’s death, she preferred an application under the Right to Information Act, 2005 (RTI), seeking the following documents:

“I. Copies of opinion and recommendation of COI board in the death case of my husband.

II. Final order of Commandant, 54 Bn in the COI of death case.

III. Annual Medical check-up Report/Medical category of my husband for the period of 5 years.

IV. Reason for non payment of Ex-gratia & Extra ordinary pension to the applicant while my husband died on duty.

V. Interest upon leave Encashment amount paid after none than 3 years due to non submission of no due certificate, to Pension Cell, ITBP by Comdt 54 Bn. Wh

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top