Arun Kumar Jha, J.—Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents-Railways.

2. The present writ petition has been filed claiming the following reliefs:—

“(i) For quashing of Order dated 12.10.2018 passed by the Ld. Judicial Member, the Central Administrative Tribunal, Patna Branch, patna in OA/050/00090/2018, whereby and whereunder the Ld. Tribunal has not found infirmity in the decision dated 14/11/2017 (Annexure-10) issued by the Respondent No.6 for compensation/Ex-gratia payment on account of death of deceased employee/husband of the petitioner have not found it proper to pay compensation to the petitioner under the Workmen Compensation Act.

(ii) For quashing of the consequential letter No. E/207/SS Bhattacharya/Engg/settle/SEE dated 26/12/2018 issued by the Respondent No. 06 (Annexure-12).

(iii) For considering the fact supported by the records that the deceased employee/husband of the Petitioner died in course of his duty, the Report of the Railway Authorities dated 15.06.2016 (Annexure-5), the Rail P.P Maheshkhoot U.D. Case No. 04/16 dated 15/06/2016 (Annexure-4), also the death report issued by the Additional Chief Medical Superintendent, East C