SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Del) 355

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J.
Rajinder - Appellant
Versus
The State NCT of Delhi - Respondent
Bail APPL No. 1953 of 2025
Decided On : 09-09-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Inderpreet Singh
For the Respondent: Naresh Kumar Chahar

The court held that organized child trafficking constitutes a severe offense under relevant Indian laws, and the applicant's actions represent exploitation of vulnerable parents and newborns.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 370(4), 120B and 34 - Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 - Application for regular bail - Application dismissed as the applicant involved in organized child trafficking by engaging vulnerable families and misleading biological parents into surrendering custody of newborns for profit (Paras 1, 4, 19, 21, 22).

(B) Bail - Considerations for granting bail - Serious allegations of organised child trafficking warrant denial of bail, as the applicant's actions exploited vulnerable parents and endangered the welfare of newborn children (Paras 18, 22, 23).

Facts of the case:
The applicant was arrested following a PCR call regarding child trafficking, where evidence linked him to an organized racket selling newborns to the highest bidders deceiving biological parents (Paras 2-5, 11-12).

Findings of Court:
Seriousness of the trafficking operation coupled with evidence including communication records and witness statements justified denying bail to applicant (Paras 22-23).

Issues: The court addressed whether sufficient grounds existed for bail amid serious allegations of child trafficking (Paras 18, 23).

Ratio Decidendi: The court reasoned that evidence pointed to a systematic commercial operation exploiting vulnerable families, making bail inappropriate (Paras 21-22).

Result: Bail application dismissed.

Table of Content
1. overview of facts leading to bail application (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. arguments of appellant versus state prosecution (Para 7 , 8)
3. court's analysis of facts and evidence (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17)
4. court's reasoning against bail application (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22)
5. conclusion of the court's decision (Para 23)
6. final order and instruction on judgment upload (Para 24 , 25)

JUDGMENT :

SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J.

1. The applicant Rajinder has preferred this application seeking grant of regular bail in FIR bearing no.121/2024, registered at Police Station Begumpur, Delhi for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 370(4), 120B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 [hereafter "IPC"] and Section 81 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 [hereafter "JJ Act"].

2. Brief facts of the case are that a PCR call vide DD No. 74A dated 20.02.2024 was received at P.S. Begumpur regarding alleged trafficking of children and noise of weeping from a neighbour's house. On the statement of the complainant, Laxmi Mehta, the present FIR was registered. The complainant stated that in the opposite house, two women, a man and two children were residing, and that she had often seen them with different newborn babies of about 20–25 days, despite none of the women being pregnant, which aroused suspicion. On 20.02.2024 she heard the cries of a child and also overheard a girl talking on the phone mentioning “5.80 or 4.80” while the child continued crying. She, along with the landlord and neighbours, went upstairs to enquire, where the women gave evasive replies. Thereafter, she called the police, who upon arrival questioned the women, who disclosed their names as Priya and Devki, and further revealed that they were engaged in the business of buying and selling children alongwith co-accused Sangram.

3. As per status report, during investigation, a newborn girl child of about 10-20 days was found in the custody of Priya (aged 24 years) and Devika @ Devki (aged 56 years), both residents of Begumpur, Delhi. They were arrested, and during interrogation, disclosed that they had been engaged in trafficking of newborn babies for the past 3-4 years with the help of present accused Rajinder and co-accused Simranjeet Kaur, who used to supply babies from Punjab for further sale. Subsequently, the present applicant i.e. Rajinder, and other co-accused persons i.e. Piyush Aggarwal, Simranjeet Kaur, Raman, Pooja, Binder Kaur and Paramjeet @ Pamma were also arrested. Co-accused Sangram however could not be arrested and proceedings against him under Section 82 of the Cr.P.C. were initiated.

4. The prosecution case is that the present applicant Rajinder, along with Simranjeet Kaur (an ASHA worker), Binder Kaur (a nurse), and others used to target parents who were poor, illiterate or vulnerable. They projected themselves as well-settled couples desirous of adoption, and with the assistance of co-accused Raman and Pooja, procured signatures of biological parents on blank notary papers under the pretext of completing adoption formalities. The children were thereafter sold to the highest bidders.

5. During investigation, two couples came forward to claim the recovered girl child and stated that they were assured their child would remain in a nearby town and be raised in a good household. Further, from CDR analysis, the present applicant was found in contact with the co-accused persons. During his arrest, blank notary papers with signatures and mobile phones were recovered from him. Further, with the permission of the Child Welfare Committee (CWC), blood samples were collected for DNA fingerprinting, which confirmed that the biological parents of the recovered child were Lekh Singh and Paramjeet Kaur. Presently, the child is in the custody of CWC and has been named "Shivangi."

6. After completion of investigation, chargesheet was filed before the concerned Court on 20.05.2024. Eventually, co-acc

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top