Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
TEJAS KARIA
Arjan Dugal – Appellant
Versus
Shubham Gandhi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. exemption from mediation granted based on urgency. (Para 1 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. claims of infringement against former employees using proprietary information. (Para 28 , 30 , 31 , 34 , 39) |
| 3. court's findings favoring the plaintiffs and granting injunctive relief. (Para 40 , 41) |
ORDER :
TEJAS KARIA, J.
IA No.21337/2025 (for exemption)
1. Exemption is allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
2. The Application stands disposed of.
I.A. No.21338/2025 (Exemption from pre-institution Mediation)
3. This is an Application filed by the Plaintiffs seeking exemption from instituting pre-litigation Mediation under Section 12A of the CC Act.
4. As the present matter contemplates urgent interim relief, in light of the judgment of the Supreme Court in Yamini Manohar v. T.K.D. Krithi 2023 SCC OnLine SC 1382, exemption from the requirement of pre- institution Mediation is granted.
5. The Application stands disposed of.
IA No.21339/2025 (O-XI R-1(4) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 )
6. The present Application has been filed on behalf of the Plaintiffs under Order XI Rule 1(4) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (“CPC”) as applicable to Commercial Suits under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 (
The court granted an ex-parte ad-interim injunction for copyright infringement, emphasizing urgency, irreparable harm, and the protection of proprietary client data.
The judgment emphasizes the protection of well-known trade marks and the prevention of deceptive similarity in commercial branding.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
