SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Del) 637

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
Exclusive Capital Limited Through Its Authorized Epresentative, Mr. Achal Kumar Jindal – Appellant
Versus
Clover Media Private Limited – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Harish Malhotra and Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Advs. with Mr. Apoorv Agarwal, Mr. Manav Goyal, Ms. Ritika Gusain, Mr. Sukrit Seth, Ms. Amrita Sony and Ms. Aastha Arora, Advs.)
For the Respondent: Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Anirudh Sharma, Ms. Meghna Mishra, Mr. Tarun Sharma and Ms. Ujjwala Gupta, Advs., Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sanyam Khetarpal, Ms. Devika Mohan, Ms. Sonal Gupta and Ms. Lisa Sankrit, Mr. Sidhant Kumar, Ms. Ekssha Kashyap and Ms. Shagun Chopra, Advs., Mr. Jayant Mehta, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Raghav Chadha, Mr. Mukund Rawat,
Mr. Nishant Upadhyay and Mr. Akash Mahwani, Advs.

Table of Content
1. plaintiff alleges fraudulent manipulation of agreements. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)

JUDGMENT :

I.A. 10952/2025 (filed on behalf of the plaintiff seeking exemption from pre-institution mediation and settlement)

Factual Matrix

3. The Plaintiff prays for a decree declaring the Inter-Corporate Loan Agreement dated 14.12.2022 (hereinafter referred to as “ICL Agreement”) executed between the plaintiff and defendant No. 1, and the Assignment Deed dated 01.02.2024 (hereinafter referred to as “VSJ Assignment Agreement”) executed between defendant No. 1 and defendant No. 2, to be illegal, non-est, and void ab initio.

5. As per the case set up by the plaintiff, in February 2024, defendant No. 1 unlawfully assigned the AHNL loan to Defendant No. 2 based on an allegedly forged and fabricated ICL Agreement dated 14.12.2022, which is the same date as the ICD agreement. The plaintiff avers that the ICL Agreement was signed by defendant No. 3, Mr. Harvinder Singh, acting without authority and contrary to the company's internal resolutions and legal mandate.

7. In the plaint, it is alleged by the plaintiff that the defendants, while acting in collusion, orchestrated a fraudulent scheme to usurp i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top