2025 Supreme(Del) 648
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
SANJEEV NARULA, J.
Aftab - Appellant
Versus
State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Another - Respondents
Bail APPL No. 2627 of 2025, Crl. M.A. No. 20515 of 2025
Decided On : 01-08-2025
For the Appellants : Sharvan Kumar Tiwari, Gopesh Tripathi, Hem Kumar
For the Respondents: Mukesh Kumar, Siddharth Goyal, Dharmender Kumar, Shashank
The court emphasized that a delayed implication without corroboration might suggest an afterthought, impacting the grounds for bail.
Headnote:In the context of Bail Application No. 2627/2025, the court examined the provisions of Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, and Sections 323, 367, 377, 34 of IPC along with Section 6 of POCSO Act. The court evaluated whether the applicant's involvement was adequately established given the victim's testimony and other evidence. The court noted that the applicant was not named in the FIR and highlighted issues surrounding the belated inclusion of the applicant's name in the investigation. The court concluded that the principles of parity warranted the granting of bail in light of previous bail rulings for co-accused. The applicant was directed to be released on bail subject to specific conditions.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. bail application considerations (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. assessment of charges and applicant's role (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. principle of parity in bail decisions (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. final ruling and conditions for bail (Para 9 , 11 , 12) |
ORDER :
1. The present application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 [“BNSS”] (formerly Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [“Cr.P.C”]) seeks regular bail in the proceedings arising from FIR No. 290/2023 dated 27th February 2023 registered under Sections 323 /367/377/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 [“IPC”] and Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 [“POCSO”] at P.S. Jahangir Puri.
2. Briefly stated, the case of the prosecution is as follows:
2.1. The present case was registered at P.S. Jahangir Puri, based on the statement of a 16-year-old victim, “D”. The victim stated that on the night of 20th/21st February, 2023, he was sitting in a park located in C-Block, Jahangir Puri, along with his friends Vansh and Piyush @ Mooli. During this period, one Aftab (the Applicant) approached them in an intoxicated state and attempted to forcibly snatch money from them. Subsequently, in order to defend himself, the victim picked up a wooden stick from the vicinity and hit the Applicant and then managed to free themselves and fled the scene.
2.2. Two days later, on 24th February, 2023, while the victim was sitting in a park in D-Block, Jahangir Puri, with his friend Nikhil @ Mota, he was approached by the Applicant’s younger brother, Arshad @ Makhkhi, accompanied by his friends Sohail, Imran and Hasibul. Shortly thereafter, five boys, namely, Tohid, Altaf @ Golu @ Shahzad, Aryan, Bhola and Shahrukh @ Babu, arrived at that location. Upon seeing them, Nikhil fled the scene. Tohid then showed an object resembling a knife to the victim, while Arshad @ Makhkhi threatened the victim with what appeared to be a pistol. The group then forcibly took the victim to a jhuggi located in D- Block, Jahangir Puri. He claimed that in the jhuggi, all the accused persons hit him with a belt and slippers. Tohid then took off his pants and inserted his private parts inside the victim’s mouth and committed unnatural sexual assault on him, while the co-accused persons watched the same. Arshad @ Makhkhi and Sharukh @ Babu recorded videos of the incident on their mobile phones. Thereafter, all of them left the scene, leaving the victim alone on the roof of the jhuggi. While the victim managed to escape from there, he did not disclose the incident to anyone at that time, out of fear and emotional distress.
2.3. On 27th February, 2023, the victim disclosed the entire sequence of events to his parents, who subsequently brought him to the police station. Based on the victim’s statement, the instant FIR was registered under Sections 323 /367/377/34 of IPC, along with Section 6 of the POCSO Act, at P.S. Jahangir Puri, Delhi and investigation commenced.
2.4. During the course of investigation, the victim was medically examined at BJRM Hospital, Jahangir Puri. However, he declined to undergo perianal and genital examination. Subsequently, his statement under Section 164 of Cr.P.C. was recorded before the Metropolitan Magistrate at Rohini Courts, wherein he reiterated his previous statement but this time, he said Arshad @ Makhkhi and Samad made his video. He also named that on the day of the incident, the people present were Tohid, Arshad @ Makhi, Imran, Hasibul, Aryan, Sohail, Sharukh @ Babu, Samad, Bhola and the Applicant.
2.5. On 1st March, 2023, Sharukh @ Babu, the Applicant was arrested and on 2nd March, 2023 they were produced before the Court who sent the Applicant for 14 days of judicial custody and 1 day police custody was obtained for the accused Shahrukh @ Babu. On 3rd March, 2023, accused Altaf @ Golu was apprehended.
2.6. The remaining co-accused, namely, Tohid, Arshad @ Makhkhi, Sohail, Hasibul, Imran, Aryan, and Bhola, were found to be juveniles.