Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
Umesh @ Kala S/o Sh. Vijender Singh – Appellant
Versus
State, Through SHO P.S. Special Cell Lodhi Road – Respondent
1. Second Application under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been filed on behalf of the Applicant Umesh @ Kala for grant of Regular Bail on case FIR No.77/2018 under Section 3/4 Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999 (hereinafter referred to as “MCOCA”), Police Station Special Cell, Delhi.
2. It is submitted that the Applicant is a family person, having his wife and old and ailing parents. He is in Judicial custody for last 6 years, 7 months and 12 days since 24.08.2018. He has been implicated falsely in this case as there is no evidence to show that he was involved in organized crime, as alleged by the Prosecution.
3. He has been implicated falsely in FIR No.83/2018 under Section 302/307/120B Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as “IPC”), Police Station Maurya Enclave which was registered on 16.03.2018. On the basis of the said FIR, the provisions of MCOCA have been wrongly invoked for registration of present FIR by wrongly portraying that the Applicant is a member of organized crime. He has already been granted Regular Bail in the said FIR No. 83/2018. While granting Bail, the Ld. Court had observed
The right to a speedy trial must be balanced against the gravity of the offence and potential risks to public safety, even in cases of prolonged judicial custody.
Prolonged detention without trial must be balanced against stringent bail conditions, recognizing the fundamental right to a speedy trial.
The court ruled that the applicant's involvement in organized crime and conspiracy to commit murder, supported by substantial evidence, justified the rejection of bail under the MCOC Act.
[The right to a speedy trial is fundamental under Article 21 of the Constitution, and prolonged detention without trial can warrant the granting of bail, especially when the prosecution has not estab....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the need to strictly construe the provisions of MCOCA, establish the mens rea, and consider the length of the period spent in custody and the unlik....
The court emphasized that bail should not be granted lightly in serious cases, particularly where the accused has a significant criminal history and the allegations are grave.
Insufficient prima facie evidence to link the applicant to organized crime syndicate warrants bail under MCOCA's stringent conditions.
The court established that prolonged pre-trial detention without a timely trial can infringe upon the constitutional right to personal liberty, and that the principle of parity can be applied in bail....
The court ruled that the applicant's extensive criminal history and ongoing risks justified the denial of bail under the U.P. Gangster Act, emphasizing the need for reasonable grounds for bail.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
