Karnataka HC Notices Sri Lankan Judge's Rights Plea
07 Mar 2026
Karnataka Proposes Social Media Ban for Under-16s
07 Mar 2026
Justice Dharmadhikari Sworn In as 55th Madras HC Chief Justice
07 Mar 2026
Punjab HC Acquits Ram Rahim in Journalist Murder
07 Mar 2026
Appellate Courts Can Rely on Unexhibited Public Documents Produced by Plaintiff: Gujarat High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Under Section 100 CPC
07 Mar 2026
Punjab & Haryana HC Denies Anticipatory Bail in Murder via Humiliation Case: Sections 103(1) & 3(5) BNS
07 Mar 2026
Security Deposit Forfeiture Without Show-Cause Notice Violates Natural Justice: Himachal Pradesh High Court
07 Mar 2026
S.202 CrPC Inquiry Not Mandatory for Public Servant Complaints If Accused Outside Jurisdiction: Supreme Court
09 Mar 2026
Professor MP Singh: Shaper of Constitutional Discourse
09 Mar 2026
Back
Next 
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
SWARANA KANTA SHARMA
Anukriti Arya – Appellant
Versus
University Of Delhi (Through Vice Chancellor – Respondent
Headnote: Read headnote
JUDGMENT :
SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J.
1. The instant petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed on behalf of the petitioners seeking following prayers:
“a. Issue writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, orders or directions to set aside/quash for issuance of writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, orders or directions for setting aside/quashing of the Information Bulletin under graduate (MBBS/BDS) admission 2024-2025 issued by the respondent no.1 & 2 to the extent it includes children/widows of Para-Military Personnel/Personnel of Police Forces {upto priority (v) only} under quota “children/widows of Personnel of the Armed Forces (CW)” in admission in UG Medical Courses (MBBS/BDS/BAMS/BUMS/BHMS) Courses 2024- 2025 under 85% Delhi quota in medical colleges of the Respondent no.1 & 2.
b. issue writ, order or directions in the nature of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, orders or directions for setting aside/quashing of List of Provisionally Eligible candidates under the aforesaid “CW” category for admission to U
The court upheld the University’s reservation policy for Armed Forces personnel, affirming that inclusion of Para-Military and Police Personnel is consistent with directives from both the Ministry of....
The court upheld the classification of admission preferences for wards of military and para-military personnel, emphasizing merit as the sole criterion for admissions.
The court affirmed that the SOP for WDP admissions was valid and did not violate equality principles, as it adhered to established guidelines.
The court ruled that educational institutions may choose not to provide reservations, and courts cannot mandate such provisions, as policy decisions lie exclusively within the state's discretion.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the University of Jammu is not obligated to provide reservation for EWS category in the absence of specific guidelines or directions from the ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the judgment of the Full Bench of the A.P. High Court and the Division Bench of Allahabad High Court, along with other case laws, influenced t....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
Listen Article