SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(P&H) 1405

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SHEEL NAGU, CJ, VIKAS SURI, J.
Vyom Yadav – Appellant
Versus
Union of India and Others - Respondents
CWP No. 16520 of 2023, CWP No. 14572 of 2024
Decided On : 14-08-2024

Advocates Appeared:
For the Respondents: Viney Yadav, Saigeeta Srivastava, Sumeet Jain, Sukhmani Patwalia, Gehna Vaishnavi

The court ruled that educational institutions may choose not to provide reservations, and courts cannot mandate such provisions, as policy decisions lie exclusively within the state's discretion.

Headnote:(A) Central Educational Institutions (Reservation in Admission) Act, 2006 - Section 2(d) - Reservation policy - Petitioner challenged non-provision of OBC reservation in engineering course admissions, asserting rights under CEI Act, 2006. The court ruled that the institutions do not qualify as 'Central Educational Institutions' as per the Act, and thus, the reservation cannot be mandated. (Paras 10, 17)

(B) Mandamus - Court jurisdiction - Directing reservation is beyond court's authority as it encroaches on policy-making; courts cannot compel the state to create reservation where none exists based on discretionary powers. (Paras 12, 16)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, Vyom Yadav, sought OBC reservation in BE admissions, despite rules stating no such reservation exists at Panjab University or the Chandigarh College. He was admitted under the general category and later challenged the decision of the institutions. (Paras 2.2, 2.7)

Findings of Court:
Institutions are not considered Central Educational Institutions under the CEI Act and their selection policy is legitimate; thus, no legal right was violated by denying OBC reservation. (Paras 17)

Issues: The court examined whether the institutions fall under the CEI Act and if the courts can compel mandatory reservation for OBC. (Paras 12, 16)

Ratio Decidendi: Mandamus cannot be issued to enforce a policy decision regarding reservations as such powers rest solely with the state. (Paras 12, 16)

Result: Both writ petitions dismissed as they lack merits.

Table of Content
1. background of reservations for obc admissions (Para 1 , 2)
2. petitioner's arguments on constitutional amendments and previous cases (Para 3 , 4)
3. respondents' rebuttal against mandatory reservations and legal framework (Para 5)
4. court's considerations and rulings on statutory provisions and reservations (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16)
5. final decision and rejection of both petitions (Para 17 , 18)

JUDGMENT :

VIKAS SURI, J.

1. This order would dispose of two writ petitions filed by the petitioner, i.e. CWP-16520-2023 and CWP-14572-2024, wherein the main issue involved is of reservation for OBC category in admissions to Bachelor of Engineering course. The above petitions pertain to the session 2023-24 and 2024-25, respectively. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, both the petitions were heard together and are being disposed of by common judgment. The documents are being referred to from CWP-16520-2023, unless specifically mentioned in reference to the context.

2. Briefly stated, petitioner-Vyom Yadav passed his 12th class and appeared in Joint Entrance Examination (Main) 2023 (for short ‘JEE-2023’) and secured 194358 rank in the Common Rank list (CRL) and 63999 in the Other Backward Class non creamy layer (OBC-NCL) as per National Testing Agency (NTA) Score (Annexure P-2).

2.1 Being an aspirant for a seat in Bachelor of Engineering (BE) course, petitioner sought admission in University Institute of Engineering and Technology, Panjab University (for short, ‘UIET’) and Chandigarh College of Engineering and Technology, Sector 26, Chandigarh (for short, ‘CCET-26’). The petitioner seeks advantage of his Certificate of Other Backward Classes dated 03.05.2023 issued by the Sub Divisional Magistrate(S), U.T. Chandigarh (Annexure P-3).

2.2 Information Brochure 2023 (Annexure P-5), which governs the admission process and seat allocation for the session 2023-24, stipulates that Panjab University institutions have no reservation under OBC category and the candidates who have opted for OBC in JEE-2023 could change category to Backward Caste, provided they fulfil the requirement of BC as per Panjab University norms, else they were to be considered under General Category. All candidates were to be considered in General Category irrespective of their claim under reserved category, subject to fulfilment of minimum eligibility requirement and must not have availed relaxation in eligibility marks.

2.3 The petitioner filed CWP-14559-2023 praying for direction to the respondent college and University therein, to apply the Central Education Institutes (Reservation and Admission) Act, 2006 (for short, ‘CEI Act, 2006’) by providing reservation to other backward classes (OBCs) category students. It was pleaded in the said petition that petitioner had represented to the concerned respondents, which was not being decided. The aforesaid writ petition was disposed of by a coordinate Bench, vide order dated 17.07.2023 (Annexure P-13), after noticing the statement of learned counsel appearing for the respondents to the effect that the representation dated 04.06.2023 (Annexure P-8) as regards petitioner’s grievance raised therein, would be considered and decided by the authorities expeditiously in accordance with law. In compliance to order dated 17.07.2023, Joint Admission Committee (for short, ‘JAC-2023’) as well as Panjab University, Chandigarh dealt with said representation and vide speaking orders dated 25.07.2023, Annexure P-14 and P-15, respectively, rejected the same. JAC-2023 observed that the admissions to CCET-26 and other colleges of engineering of Panjab University were being made as per brochure published on 15.05.2023 with the commencement of admission process. The seat matrix of each participating institute approved by the respective authorities was mentioned in the brochure. The representation had been made after the start of admission process. The admissions in the participating instituti

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top