IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SHEEL NAGU, VIKAS SURI
Vyom Yadav – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of reservations for obc admissions (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. petitioner's arguments on constitutional amendments and previous cases (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. respondents' rebuttal against mandatory reservations and legal framework (Para 5) |
| 4. court's considerations and rulings on statutory provisions and reservations (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 5. final decision and rejection of both petitions (Para 17 , 18) |
JUDGMENT :
VIKAS SURI, J.
1. This order would dispose of two writ petitions filed by the petitioner, i.e. CWP-16520-2023 and CWP-14572-2024, wherein the main issue involved is of reservation for OBC category in admissions to Bachelor of Engineering course. The above petitions pertain to the session 2023-24 and 2024-25, respectively. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, both the petitions were heard together and are being disposed of by common judgment. The documents are being referred to from CWP-16520-2023, unless specifically mentioned in reference to the context.
2. Briefly stated, petitioner-Vyom Yadav passed his 12th class and appeared in Joint Entrance Examination (Main) 2023 (for short ‘JEE-2023’) and secured 194358 rank in t
Neil Aurelio Nunes (OBC Reservation) and others vs. Union of India and others
Pradeep Jain vs. Union of India
State of Punjab vs. Anshika Goyal and others
Mukesh Kumar vs. State of Uttarakhand
Suresh Chand Gautam vs. State of Uttar Pradesh
Gulshan Prakash vs. State of Haryana
Suresh Chand Gautam vs. State of U.P.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.