SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Del) 978

HIGH COURT OF DELHI
MS KHUKHRAIN BUILDERS & ORS. – Appellant
Versus
INDIAN BANK & ORS. – Respondent


Table of Content
1. petitioners invoked constitutional rights under article 226. (Para 6 , 8 , 9)
2. petitioners argue against non-compliance with msme guidelines. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 14)
3. court observes flaws in petitioners' arguments and procedure. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19)
4. writ petition dismissed for laches and failure to exhaust remedies. (Para 20 , 21)

JUDGMENT :

DHARMESH SHARMA, J.

CM APPL. 54730/2024 - (EXMP)

1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2. The application stands disposed of.

CM APPL. 54731/2024

3. This application has been moved on behalf of the petitioners seeking permission to file lengthy list of dates and synopsis.

4. For the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed.

5. The application stands disposed of.

W.P. (C) 13094/2024 & CM APPL. 54729/2024

6. The petitioner No.1 is a partnership firm, which along with its partners, who are arraigned as petitioners No. 2 to 4, hereinafter referred to as the petitioners, invoke the writ jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, 1950 for directions to the respondents not to curtail the fundamental rights of the petitioners under Articles 19(1)(g), 21 and 300A of the Con

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top