Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
A N PRASAD – Appellant
Versus
CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner’s career background and procurement transaction (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. allegation of bribe and investigation initiation (Para 6 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. evidence and credibility of allegations discussed (Para 12 , 14 , 19) |
| 4. investigation findings regarding video evidence (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 5. court's disagreement with special judge on closure report (Para 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 6. arguments on lack of evidence and procedural issues (Para 28 , 32 , 35) |
| 7. requirement of evidence for bribery under law (Para 41 , 55 , 69) |
| 8. final ruling and discharge of petitioner (Para 74 , 76 , 77) |
JUDGMENT :
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J.
1. Petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ('Cr.P.C' hereinafter) has been filed on behalf of the Petitioner for setting aside the Order dated 27.11.2020 vide which the Closure Report filed by the Respondent- CBI in FIR RC-DAI-2019-A0022, under Section 120 B read with Sections 7/12/13(2) and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 has been rejected and Order dated 15.02.2021 vide which he has been summoned.
2. The brief background, as spelt out by the Petitioner is that upon his selection by UPSC in February, 2017, he joined Emp
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
