SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Del) 798

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
A N PRASAD – Appellant
Versus
CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J.

1. Petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ('Cr.P.C' hereinafter) has been filed on behalf of the Petitioner for setting aside the Order dated 27.11.2020 vide which the Closure Report filed by the Respondent- CBI in FIR RC-DAI-2019-A0022, under Section 120 B read with Sections 7/12/13(2) and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 has been rejected and Order dated 15.02.2021 vide which he has been summoned.

2. The brief background, as spelt out by the Petitioner is that upon his selection by UPSC in February, 2017, he joined Employees State Insurance Corporation (henceforth referred to as “ESIC”) as Deputy Director and was promoted to the post of Joint Director in March, 2008. He performed all his duties and responsibilities with full devotion and commitment and his ACR/APAR has always been above the zone of consideration and he had received commendations for his work as well.

3. Procurement Demand of 10 Racks: On 25.08.2017, requisition of 10 Racks was made by the Medical Record Officer- Prem Raj to the Medical Superintendent, ESIC Hospital, Basaidarapur. On 30.08.2017, the Assistant Director-Narendra Dahiya, issued

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top