IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
MANEESH GUPTA – Appellant
Versus
STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's claim regarding bail cancellation. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. arguments for petitioner's bail cancellation request. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 3. respondent's defense against bail cancellation. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 4. court's analysis of bail application process. (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 5. final order on petition regarding bail. (Para 33 , 34 , 35) |
JUDGMENT :
VIKAS MAHAJAN, J.
1. The present petition has been filed under Section 483(3) read with Section 528 BNSS against the impugned order dated 21.09.2024 passed by the Court of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-03, North-West District, Rohini Courts, Delhi whereby the respondent no.2 was admitted to regular bail in case bearing FIR No. 330/2021 under Section 302 IPC registered at Police Station Maurya Enclave. Consequently, a prayer has been made to cancel the bail granted to the respondent no.2.
2. The petitioner is the father of the deceased, who as per the prosecution version, was allegedly killed by the accused/respondent no.2 namely, Mayank Antil on 21.04.2021.
3. The case of the prosecution as borne out from the Status Report is that on 25.
Puran vs. Rambilas and Another
Brij Nandan Jaiswal vs. Munna alias Munna Jaiswal and Another
Kunwar Singh Meena vs. State of Rajasthan and Another
Ranjit Singh vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and Others
Prakash Kadam and Others vs. Ramprasad Vishwanath Gupta and Another
Daulat Ram and Ors. vs. State of Haryana
Ragubir Singh vs. State of Bihar
State (Delhi Administration) vs. Sanjay Gandhi
CBI, Hyderabad v. Subramani Gopalakrishnan and Others
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.