SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Del) 809

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
JYOTI WAZIR & ORS. – Appellant
Versus
DEEPAK KHOSLA & ORS. – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

VIKAS MAHAJAN, J.

1. The question with which this Court is confronted in the present judgment is whether the issues which were framed vide order dated 26.09.2011 covered the amended plaint or whether additional issues need to be framed, which if framed would require leading of additional evidence in respect thereof.

2. To find an answer to the above question, it is necessary to appreciate the background facts of the case.

3. The property bearing number 11, Prithvi Raj Road, New Delhi was owned by Late Sh. R.N. Khosla, who had two sons namely Sh. K.G. Khoslaand Sh. J.C. Khosla. The contesting parties in the present suit for partition are the heirs of Late Sh. K.G. Khosla. The plaintiffs are the three daughters of Late Sh. K.G. Khosla, whereas the Defendant No.1 is his son. When the suit was originally filed, it was filed by the Plaintiff No.1 as the sole plaintiff. Subsequently, the two other daughters of Late Sh. K.G. Khosla, who had been originally arrayed as Defendant Nos.4 and 5, were transposed as Plaintiff Nos.2 and 3 vide order dated 18.04.2006. Defendants No.2 & 3 are the sons of Defendant No.1. The Defendant No.4 (originally Defendant No.6) is the aforesaid Sh. J.C.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top