HIGH COURT OF DELHI
NATIONAL RESTAURANT ASSOCIATION OF INDIA & ORS. – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA & ANR. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J.
1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.
2. Whether the collection of mandatory Service Charge by restaurants and other establishments is permissible under the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 (hereinafter the ‘CPA 2019’)?
Background:
3. The Central Consumer Protection Authority (‘CCPA’) established under Section 10 of the CPA, 2019 received several complaints regarding restaurants and hotels (hereinafter, the ‘restaurant establishments’) charging ‘Service Charge’ over and above the cost of the food items. This Charge in the range of 5-20% in lieu of ‘Tip’ or ‘Gratuity’ was being collected from consumers on a compulsory basis. In addition, Goods and Services Tax (‘GST’) was charged on the said service charge, resulting in substantial burden consumers. The CCPA then issued guidelines to prevent unfair trade practices and protect consumer interest with regard to levying of service charge, on 4th July, 2022. The same are extracted hereinbelow for ready reference:
“3. It has come to the notice of the CCPA through many grievances registered on the National Consumer Helpline that restaurants and hotels are levying service charge in the bill by default, w


Gulf Co. Ltd. v. Union of India
Sukhdev Singh and Others v. Bhagatram Sardar Singh Raghuvanshi and Another
Modern Dental College and Research Centre and Others v. State of Madhya Pradesh and Others
Karnataka Live Band Restaurants Association v. State of Karnataka and Others
Cellular Operators Association of India and Others v. Telecom Regulatory Authority of India
Central Inland Water Transport Corpn. Ltd. v. Brojo Nath Ganguly
Rattan Chand Hira Chand v. Askar Nawaz Jung and others
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.