SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Del) 1008

HIGH COURT OF DELHI
PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK – Appellant
Versus
MANOJ KUMAR – Respondent


Table of Content
1. overview of the case and its factual background. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
2. contentions of the punjab national bank regarding the tribunal's award. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13)
3. arguments of the workman opposing pnb's claims and asserting his rights. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32)
4. court's analysis of the decisions and observations of the tribunal. (Para 35 , 36 , 40 , 41 , 44 , 45)
5. court's ruling on the regularization of services and its implications. (Para 66 , 70 , 75 , 79 , 83 , 85 , 90 , 91 , 101)
6. final judgments and orders concerning the writ petitions. (Para 102 , 103 , 104 , 106)

JUDGMENT :

CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.

1. The instant writ petitions under Article 226 read with Article 227 of the Constitution of India (“Constitution” hereinafter) has been filed by the respective petitioners challenging the award dated 14th February, 2007 (“impugned award” hereinafter) passed by the learned Presiding Officer, Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court in Industrial Dispute bearing ID No. 158/1999.

FACTUAL MATRIX

2. Sh. Manoj Kumar (“the workman” hereinafter) was engaged vide Regional Office Letter no. R

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top