SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Del) 877

HIGH COURT OF DELHI
NAVIN CHAWLA, SHALINDER KAUR, JJ
SANDEEP GUPTA – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS – Respondent


Advocates:
Mr. Tapas Das, Adv., Mr. Sahaj Garg, SPC for UOI, Mr. Shyam Singh Negi, HQ DGBR

Table of Content
1. petitioner applied for retirement (Para 1 , 2 , 5)
2. counsel for petitioner raised contentions (Para 3 , 4)
3. counsel for respondents submitted (Para 6 , 7 , 9 , 10 , 11)
4. court heard the learned counsels (Para 8)
5. court ruled on voluntary retirement (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17)
6. writ petition allowed (Para 18 , 19)

JUDGMENT :

1. The petitioner, a Superintending Engineer (in short, “SE”) (Civil) in the Border Roads Organization (in short, “BRO”) has approached this Court to seek directions to the respondents to consider the petitioner as deemed to have voluntarily retired with effect from 17.04.2024 pursuant to his applications dated 30.12.2023 and 30.03.2024 under Rule 48 of the Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 (in short, “CCS Pension Rules”). Although, in the petition the petitioner has taken the ground of voluntary retirement under Rule 56(k) of the Fundamental Rules (in short, “FRs”). Additionally, the petitioner has also sought directions to the respondents for grant of all pensionary benefits.

a) The petitioner was appointed in the General Reserve Engineer Force (in short, “GREF”) in BRO on 04.03.1995 as an Assistant Executive Engineer (in

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top