IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
THE STATE (GNCT OF DELHI) – Appellant
Versus
SAHIL CHOPRA & ORS. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J.
1. The present petition has been preferred by the State, under Section 397 read with Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereafter "Cr.P.C.") seeking setting aside of the order on charge dated 20.09.2023 (hereafter "impugned order") passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Patiala House Court, Delhi (hereafter "learned Sessions Court") in Sessions Case No. 306/2020, arising out of FIR No. 362/2020, dated 18.08.2020, registered under Sections 376D/506/109 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereafter "IPC") at Police Station Kishan Garh, Delhi.
2. Briefly stated, the facts of the case, as evident from the records and the impugned order, are that the victim in the present case is a national of Uzbekistan and was residing at a rented accommodation with her friends. Allegedly, on 13.08.2020, she was alone in her house when the accused no. 1 and 2, namely Sahil Chopra and Baljeet Singh, had committed rape upon her. Thereafter, they had threatened her not to take any action against them. It is stated that the accused Shokkhnoza Trigarhera @ Shahnoz @ Shahnaj had instigated the other accused persons to commit rape. After completion of
A trial court must possess sufficient prima facie evidence to sustain charges; contradictions in the victim's statements led to the discharge of the accused.
Charges in sexual assault cases can be framed based solely on the victim's statements without internal medical examination compliance.
At discharge stage, material contradictions in prosecutrix statements, lack of medical corroboration, and inconsistent theft allegations justify discharge if no prima facie case, preventing abuse of ....
Consent in intimate relationships cannot be retrospectively withdrawn; criminal law should protect, not punish based on failed relationships.
The absence of specific allegations against the petitioner regarding gang rape under Section 376D of the IPC necessitates the setting aside of the charge, reaffirming the need for prima facie evidenc....
Point of Law : Criminal Law - Gang Rape - Charge can be quashed if evidence which the prosecutor proposes to adduce to prove guilt of accused, even if fully accepted before it is challenged by cross-....
The court established that mere suspicion is insufficient for charge framing; only a prima facie case based on the victim's statements justifies proceeding under criminal statutes.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for a strong suspicion based on material evidence to proceed with framing charges in criminal cases, and the duty of the Court to c....
The court emphasized that a mere statement by the prosecutrix, though crucial, must inspire confidence, particularly when significant delays exist in reporting alleged offenses.
The court established that consensual relationships, even if based on promises of marriage, do not amount to rape unless there is clear evidence of deception or coercion, and the standard for proceed....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.