SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Del) 886

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
THE STATE (GNCT OF DELHI) – Appellant
Versus
SAHIL CHOPRA & ORS. – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J.

1. The present petition has been preferred by the State, under Section 397 read with Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereafter "Cr.P.C.") seeking setting aside of the order on charge dated 20.09.2023 (hereafter "impugned order") passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Patiala House Court, Delhi (hereafter "learned Sessions Court") in Sessions Case No. 306/2020, arising out of FIR No. 362/2020, dated 18.08.2020, registered under Sections 376D/506/109 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereafter "IPC") at Police Station Kishan Garh, Delhi.

2. Briefly stated, the facts of the case, as evident from the records and the impugned order, are that the victim in the present case is a national of Uzbekistan and was residing at a rented accommodation with her friends. Allegedly, on 13.08.2020, she was alone in her house when the accused no. 1 and 2, namely Sahil Chopra and Baljeet Singh, had committed rape upon her. Thereafter, they had threatened her not to take any action against them. It is stated that the accused Shokkhnoza Trigarhera @ Shahnoz @ Shahnaj had instigated the other accused persons to commit rape. After completion of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top