Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J
HARMEET SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitions heard together for equitable adjudication. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. facts concerning property and alleged misconduct. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court observations on police inaction amidst allegations. (Para 5 , 6 , 12) |
| 4. legal arguments challenging asj's findings. (Para 7 , 11) |
| 5. conclusion on proper judicial authority and final order. (Para 32 , 53) |
ORDER :
2. The captioned petitions under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter as the “Code”) [now under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter as the “BNSS”)] read with Article 227 of the Constitution of India have been filed on behalf of the petitioner seeking quashing of the order dated 17th July, 2013 (hereinafter as the ”impugned order”) passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-01 (East), Karkardooma Courts, Delhi (hereinafter as the “ASJ”).
4. On the eventful day of 27th November, 2011, the respondent no. 2 to 6 in CRL MC No. 4544/2013 i.e., Mrs. Harvinder Kaur, Mr. Jitender Singh, Mr. Tilak Raj, Mr. Sonu and Mr. Monu (hereinafter as the “accused individuals”) entered the 3rd floor of the subject property and allegedly started damaging the premises. Accordi
A magistrate can only direct the officer in charge of a police station to register an FIR; directions to superior officers exceed this authority.
Direction for Police Investigation – Option to direct registration of case and its investigation by police should be exercised where some “investigation” is required, which is of a nature that is not....
The Magistrate must judiciously exercise discretion in registering FIRs under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C., ensuring that mechanical refusals are avoided when cognizable offences are disclosed.
The Magistrate has discretion under Section 156(3) of the CrPC to determine whether to direct an investigation, particularly in civil disputes masquerading as criminal matters.
The court upheld lower courts' discretion in denying FIR registration, ruling that the petitioner had sufficient evidence and means to substantiate his claims without police assistance.
The Magistrate has discretion under Section 156(3) of Cr.P.C. to determine the necessity of police investigation based on the nature of allegations and available evidence.
As per Section 154 of Cr.P.C. object of registration of FIR is that every information relating to cognizance of offence whether or given orally or otherwise officer incharge of police station has to ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
