IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD, J., SANJAY PRASAD, J.
Suken Singh Sardar @ Sukhen Singh Sardar Son Of Jogeshwar Singh Sardar - Appellant
Versus
State Of Jharkhand - Respondent
Cr. Appeal (DB) No.1827 of 2023
Decided On : 19-02-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the case and charges against the appellant. (Para 1 , 2 , 6 , 10 , 11) |
| 2. details of the alleged crime and victim's testimony. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 7 , 8 , 25 , 26) |
| 3. arguments for suspension of sentence by both sides. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 4. prosecution's evidence and witness reliability. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 5. legal standards for suspension of sentence application. (Para 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 6. conclusion on evidence and denial of suspension of sentence. (Para 30 , 31 , 32) |
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Appeal (DB) No.1827 of 2023 ------
Suken Singh Sardar @ Sukhen Singh Sardar, Aged about 26 years, Son of Jogeshwar Singh Sardar, Resident of Pure Silli, P.O. & P.S.
Chandil (Kapali), District-Seraikella-Kharsawan.
…. …. Appellant Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... Respondent CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRASAD ------
06/Dated: 19.02.2025 I.A. No.9748 of 2023 Per Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.
1. The instant interlocutory application has been filed under Section 389(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, for suspension of sentence dated 10.06.2022 passed by the learned Special Judge, POCSO Act, Seraikella-Kharsawan, in connection with POCSO Case No.52 of 2019, arising out of Chandil P.S. Case No.106 of 2019, whereby and whereunder, the appellant has been convicted for the offence under Sections 323, 341, 342, 354, 354A, 354B read with Section 34 of the IPC, Sections 376-D, 395, 504/34 & 506/34 of the IPC and Section 6 & 10 of the POCSO Act and sentenced to undergo R.I. for life along with fine of Rs.20,000/- and in default of payment of fine, he has further been directed to undergo S.I.
2. He has further been sentenced to undergo R.I. for one year along with fine of Rs.800/- and in default of payment of fine, he has to undergo S.I. for ten days. He has further been sentenced to undergo R.I. for four years along with fine of Rs.5000/- and in default of payment of fine, he has to undergo S.I. for six months and he has further been sentenced to undergo R.I. for ten years along with fine of Rs.10,000/- and in default, he has to undergo S.I. for one year and all the sentences have been directed to run concurrently.
3. The case of the prosecution on the basis of written report of the informant/victim, addressed to the Officer in-charge of Kapali O.P. on 29.08.2019 alleging therein that she was aged about 17 years and 10 months. On 28.08.2019 at about 8:45 P.M. she along with Arshdeep left Lalaji Hotel, Sakchi, Jamshedpur in his Fortuner vehicle no. JH05CH0012 for Marine Drive, Kapali Area and arrived there around 9:30 P.M. where Arshdeep told her that his vehicle was not starting.
4. In the meantime, two persons arrived and very soon 10 more persons also arrived there. They attempted to snatch the keys of the Fortuner vehicle and she shifted to the second row of the seat from the first row, out of fear. She has alleged that the miscreants pulled her out and started to take her towards the forest. She could hear the name of one boy named Munna who was being called by other miscreants and claimed that she could identify him. They dragged her towards the bushes near the river where three accused sexually harassed and raped her and the remaining accused persons outraged her modesty, tortured and teased her.
5. She has further alleged that in that course they pulled and threw her red coloured pantie with
The court emphasized that suspension of sentence post-conviction requires strong reasons, as the presumption of innocence is no longer applicable.
The court affirmed that consent is irrelevant if the victim is a minor, emphasizing that credible evidence, especially concerning age, is paramount in cases under the POCSO Act.
In cases involving sexual assault of minors, the consistent testimony of the victim, corroborated by medical evidence, is sufficient for conviction, and such conviction justifies denial of suspension....
The court ruled the victim's consistent testimony sufficiently supports conviction under the POCSO Act, thus rejecting the suspension of sentence.
The consistent testimony of a victim can uphold a conviction under the POCSO Act, regardless of the absence of physical evidence of assault.
The court upheld the conviction for gang rape based on credible victim testimony, ruling that contradictions and co-accused acquittals do not automatically justify sentence suspension.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.