SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Jhk) 142

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD, J., SANJAY PRASAD, J.
Suken Singh Sardar @ Sukhen Singh Sardar Son Of Jogeshwar Singh Sardar - Appellant
Versus
State Of Jharkhand - Respondent
Cr. Appeal (DB) No.1827 of 2023
Decided On : 19-02-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mrs. Rashmi Kumar, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. Vishwanath Roy, Spl. P.P.

The court emphasized that suspension of sentence post-conviction requires strong reasons, as the presumption of innocence is no longer applicable.

Headnote:(A) Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 389(1) - Protection of Children from Sexual Offenses Act, 2012 - Sections 6 and 10 - Conviction of appellant under multiple sections of IPC and POCSO Act - Court assessed evidence including 31 witnesses and statements under Section 164 Cr.P.C. - Importance placed on the victim’s age and testimony, substantiating charges of sexual assault and rape. (Paras 1, 3, 25, 26, 27, 32)

(B) Criminal Law - Suspension of sentence - Differentiation between pre-trial bail and post-conviction bail - Strong compelling reasons must be established to grant suspension post-conviction; finding of guilt alters the presumption of innocence. (Paras 22, 23)

Facts of the case:
The appellant was convicted following allegations of multiple offenses including rape of a minor. The victim’s detailed testimony supported the prosecution's case while contradictions were noted in evidence but deemed immaterial.

Findings of Court:
The court found substantial evidence, including medical reports and identification by the victim, to sustain the conviction.

Issues: Determining the reliability of the prosecution's case and the validity of the conviction based on presented evidence.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the prima facie merits of the case regarding the suspension of sentence, reiterating the established legal principles distinguishing pre-trial bail from post-conviction relief.

Result: The interlocutory application for suspension of sentence was rejected.

Table of Content
1. overview of the case and charges against the appellant. (Para 1 , 2 , 6 , 10 , 11)
2. details of the alleged crime and victim's testimony. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 7 , 8 , 25 , 26)
3. arguments for suspension of sentence by both sides. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15)
4. prosecution's evidence and witness reliability. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19)
5. legal standards for suspension of sentence application. (Para 21 , 22 , 23)
6. conclusion on evidence and denial of suspension of sentence. (Para 30 , 31 , 32)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Appeal (DB) No.1827 of 2023 ------

Suken Singh Sardar @ Sukhen Singh Sardar, Aged about 26 years, Son of Jogeshwar Singh Sardar, Resident of Pure Silli, P.O. & P.S.

Chandil (Kapali), District-Seraikella-Kharsawan.

…. …. Appellant Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... Respondent CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRASAD ------

    For the Appellant : Mrs. Rashmi Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Vishwanath Roy, Spl. P.P.
    ------

06/Dated: 19.02.2025 I.A. No.9748 of 2023 Per Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.

1. The instant interlocutory application has been filed under Section 389(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, for suspension of sentence dated 10.06.2022 passed by the learned Special Judge, POCSO Act, Seraikella-Kharsawan, in connection with POCSO Case No.52 of 2019, arising out of Chandil P.S. Case No.106 of 2019, whereby and whereunder, the appellant has been convicted for the offence under Sections 323, 341, 342, 354, 354A, 354B read with Section 34 of the IPC, Sections 376-D, 395, 504/34 & 506/34 of the IPC and Section 6 & 10 of the POCSO Act and sentenced to undergo R.I. for life along with fine of Rs.20,000/- and in default of payment of fine, he has further been directed to undergo S.I.

    for two years, R.I. for six years along with fine of Rs.8,000/- and in default of payment of fine, he has further been sentenced to undergo S.I. for one year, R.I. for one year along with fine of Rs.800/- and in default of payment of fine, he has been directed to undergo S.I. for ten days . He has further been sentenced to undergo S.I. for one month along with fine of Rs.300/-/- and in default of payment of fine, he has to undergo S.I. for three days.

2. He has further been sentenced to undergo R.I. for one year along with fine of Rs.800/- and in default of payment of fine, he has to undergo S.I. for ten days. He has further been sentenced to undergo R.I. for four years along with fine of Rs.5000/- and in default of payment of fine, he has to undergo S.I. for six months and he has further been sentenced to undergo R.I. for ten years along with fine of Rs.10,000/- and in default, he has to undergo S.I. for one year and all the sentences have been directed to run concurrently.

    Factual Matrix

3. The case of the prosecution on the basis of written report of the informant/victim, addressed to the Officer in-charge of Kapali O.P. on 29.08.2019 alleging therein that she was aged about 17 years and 10 months. On 28.08.2019 at about 8:45 P.M. she along with Arshdeep left Lalaji Hotel, Sakchi, Jamshedpur in his Fortuner vehicle no. JH05CH0012 for Marine Drive, Kapali Area and arrived there around 9:30 P.M. where Arshdeep told her that his vehicle was not starting.

4. In the meantime, two persons arrived and very soon 10 more persons also arrived there. They attempted to snatch the keys of the Fortuner vehicle and she shifted to the second row of the seat from the first row, out of fear. She has alleged that the miscreants pulled her out and started to take her towards the forest. She could hear the name of one boy named Munna who was being called by other miscreants and claimed that she could identify him. They dragged her towards the bushes near the river where three accused sexually harassed and raped her and the remaining accused persons outraged her modesty, tortured and teased her.

5. She has further alleged that in that course they pulled and threw her red coloured pantie with

            Click Here to Read the rest of this document
            1
            2
            3
            4
            5
            6
            7
            8
            9
            10
            11
            SupremeToday Portrait Ad
            supreme today icon
            logo-black

            An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

            Please visit our Training & Support
            Center or Contact Us for assistance

            qr

            Scan Me!

            India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

            For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

            whatsapp-icon Back to top