SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Del) 8

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J.
Himanshu Gupta – Appellant
Versus
The State NCT of Delhi – Respondent
Bail Application Nos. 765, 766 of 2026
Decided On : 25-02-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : Ajay Paul, Geetu Paul, Dayanand Sharma, Kamlesh Chandra Tripathi
For the Respondents: Naresh Kumar Chahar, Neha Singh, Aastha Chaturvedi Rahul Vats, Satender Dabas

Contractors are held fully responsible for safety measures during public works; negligence resulting in fatality warrants strict legal repercussions.

Headnote:(A) Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 - Sections 105 and 106 - Anticipatory bail - Applicants sought bail in connection with an FIR for negligence leading to death due to unsafe excavation practices - The Court highlighted deficiencies in safety measures and responsibility of the contractor, reiterating that the contractor bears absolute liability for accidents during execution. (Paras 1, 25, 30, 37)

(B) Negligence - Contractor's obligations - The contractor is required to ensure proper safety measures and compliance with permissions issued by authorities; failure to do so leading to fatal accidents results in penal liability. (Paras 27, 34, 39)

Facts of the case:
The case arose when a motorcycle rider fell into a deep pit on the road, which was excavated by a contractor, resulting in death due to neglect of necessary precautions by the responsible parties. (Paras 2, 3)

Findings of Court:
The Court found that the applicants, as contractors, failed to implement necessary safety measures, despite being responsible for the project. Investigations revealed negligent actions post-incident. (Paras 30, 38)

Issues: The Court addressed whether the applicants could be granted anticipatory bail given their responsibility for the safety protocols during the excavation and subsequent actions taken after the accident. (Paras 6, 40)

Ratio Decidendi: The court concluded that negligence in executing safety obligations, leading to a preventable death, and the actions to conceal the safety failures indicate a need for custodial investigation. (Paras 28, 37)

Result: Bail applications dismissed.

Table of Content
1. factual background surrounding fir and incident details. (Para 1 , 2)
2. arguments presented by prosecution and defense. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
3. analysis of contract obligations of kksil. (Para 6 , 7 , 8)
4. examination of subcontractual agreements and permissions. (Para 9 , 10 , 11)
5. investigation findings related to duty of care. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15)
6. conditions of work order regarding safety measures. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22)
7. contradictory claims by the applicants on operational control. (Para 23 , 24 , 25)
8. court's view on negligence and community accountability. (Para 26 , 27 , 28)
9. legal reasoning on the duty to ensure public safety. (Para 29 , 30 , 31)
10. management and contractor responsibilities and liabilities. (Para 32 , 33 , 34)
11. concerns regarding post-incident actions and public safety. (Para 35 , 36 , 37)
12. final decision on the denial of anticipatory bail. (Para 38 , 39)
13. conclusion on the dismissal of bail applications. (Para 40 , 41 , 42 , 43)

JUDGMENT :

SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J.

1. By way of these applications, the applicants seek grant of anticipatory bail in case arising out of FIR bearing no. 35/2026, registered at Police Station Janakpuri, Delhi for the commission of offence punishable under Sections 105/238(b)/9(2)/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 [hereafter "BNS"].

Factual Background

2. Briefly stated, the facts of the present case are that the FIR in question was registered on receipt of a PCR call on 06.02.2026, informing that a motorcycle rider had fallen into a deep pit and was in need of immediate assistance. Upon receipt of the said information, police officials reached the spot, i.e. B-3B, near Andhra School, Janakpuri, New Delhi, where they found a young boy along with his motorcycle lying inside a pit measuring about 20 feet in length, 13 feet in width and about 14 feet in depth, which had been dug in the middle of the road. During the course of investigation, it was revealed that the said pit had been dug by the Delhi Jal Board [hereafter "DJB"]. With the assistance of officials from the Fire Brigade, the injured boy was taken out of the pit and shifted to Deen Dayal Upadhyay Hospital; however, he was unfortunately declared brought dead. Thereafter, the Crime Team and the FSL Team were called at the spot, and investigation in the present case is being carried out.

Submissions before the Court

3. The learned APP appearing for the State has argued that the offence in question is of a serious nature. It is submitted that during investigation, upon analysis of the CCTV footage, it was revealed that no precautionary or safety measures, such as display of caution boards, barricading or other warning mechanisms, had been put in place by the contractor or the labourers at or around the excavation site, which ultimately resulted in the death of a young motorcycle rider. It is further submitted that the CCTV footage also shows that immediately after the incident, one labourer, namely Yogesh, was seen covering the excavation site by placing barricades and curtains on the road where the incident had occurred. Investigation has further revealed that the said labourer Yogesh had informed the sub- contractor, Rajesh, about the incident at around 12:22 AM on 06.02.2026, i.e., within a few minutes of the incident. Thereafter, the sub-contractor Rajesh is stated to have informed the present accused Himanshu Gupta, brother of co-accused Kavish Gupta, through a WhatsApp call at about 01:56 AM, following which they remained in continuous contact with each other till the morning hours. It is further contended that the DJB had issued a work order on 09.10.2025 for rectification of peripheral sewer lines in the Janakpuri area to KKSIL-O LINER JV, a joint venture having lead partner as M/s K.K. Spun Indian Limited [hereafter "KKSIL"], of which the present applicants, i.e. Himanshu Gupta and Kavish Gupta, are Directors. As per the terms of the contract, the contractor was res

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top