IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Ramesh Sinha, C.J., Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J.
Mahaveer College of Ayurvedic Science Village and ors. - Petitioners
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh Through - Medical Education (Ayush) Department and ors. - Respondents
WPC No. 4327 of 2023
Decided On : 25-09-2024
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners challenge state quota in minority institutions (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. state defends regulation for local minority admissions (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. court reviews admission rules and previous judgments (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. definition of minority status based on state demographics (Para 10 , 11) |
| 5. state cannot enforce quotas in minority institutions (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 6. importance of autonomy for unaided minority institutions (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 7. invalidation of state quotas under article 30 rights (Para 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 8. court declares state rule as unconstitutional (Para 21) |
| 9. directive for proper admissions in minority institutions (Para 22) |
ORDER :
Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J.
1. The present is the writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by the petitioners through their unaided private educational institution for declaring the Rule 4(1)(d)(i) of the Chhattisgarh Ayush Graduate Course ADMISSION RULES , 2023 (Annexure-P/1) being ultra virus and unconstitutional and also for holding that there can be no fixation of the Govt. seats in the minority institutions and further for a direction to the respondents authorities to permit the petitioner No.1 to admit all India students in BAMS.
2. The petition has been filed for the following relief(s):-
“I. That this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to declare the rule 4(1)(d)(i) of the Chhattisgarh Ayush Graduate Course ADMISSION RULES , 2023 (Annexure P/1) as being ultra vires and unconstitutional.
II. That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to hold that there can be no fixation of government seats in the minority institutions.
III. That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to amend the counselling notice dated 21.09.2023 (Annexure-P/8) and further direct the respondent authorities to permit the petitioner No.1 to admit all India students in BAMS course.
IV. Any other relief, which this Hon’ble Court deems, fit in the facts and circumstances may also be granted in favour of the petitioner.”
3. The brief facts of the case as pleaded by the parties in the writ petition are that the petitioner is an unaided minority institution imparting education and degree in Bachelor of Aayurvedik Medicine and Surgery (BAMS) and was established in the year 2017. The respondent No.1, C.G. Govt. has framed C.G. Ayush Graduate Course ADMISSION RULES , 2023 (hereinafter called as ‘the ADMISSION RULES , 2023’) wherein the State has fixed quota in minority institutions under Rule 4(1)(d)(i) of the ADMISSION RULES , 2023 which is impermissible and against the various judgments passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in this regard. Prior to the enforcement of the ADMISSION RULES , 2023, the C.G. Ayush Graduation Course ADMISSION RULES , 2019 was applicable wherein the minority institutions were exclusively excluded from the ambit of such quota and admissions were made strictly in accordance of the merit obtained by the students of all India in NEET-UG examination. No such quota has been fixed either in dental or medical minority institutions, but only in the minority institutions imparting education in Ayush course said quota has been fixed. Further, the State has no right to fix quota of the weaker society in the minority institutions under the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009. As per Rule 4(1)(a) of the ADMISSION RULES , 2023, the said quota is 85% of the total seats and as per Rule 4(1)(d)(i) of the ADMISSION RULES , 2023 out of 85% of the said quota, 50% seats has to be filled up by local minority students, i.e., from Jain community of Chhattisgarh State for which the minority institution is established and remaining 50% from general merit list prepared for the C.G. State from which counseling is to be conducted.
It is also the case of the petitioner that the petitioner No.1 is not receiving any grant from the State Govt. No Government hospital has been attached with the petitioner No.
T.M.A. Pai Foundation and others Vs. State of Karnataka and others
P.A. Inamdar and others Vs. State of Maharashtra and others
Islamic Academy of Education and another Vs. State of Karnataka and others
Modern Dental College & Research Center Vs. State of M.P.
The fixation of government seat quotas in unaided minority institutions is unconstitutional and violates their fundamental right to autonomy under Article 30(1) of the Constitution.
The right of minority educational institutions to administer admissions under Article 30(1) is subject to reasonable regulations by the State to maintain educational standards.
The court found that minority institutions can be regulated by the State regarding admissions while retaining their autonomy, ensuring compliance with educational standards and merit without violatin....
Point of Law : Law could not be deemed to be unreasonable unless it was totally destructive or annihilative of the right under Art.30(1).
Minority educational institutions can be established without prior permission, but the State may require a minimum percentage of admissions from the minority community to maintain their status.
The rights of minorities to establish and administer educational institutions of their choice under Article 30 of the Constitution of India are subject to reasonable regulations that are necessary to....
The restriction imposed by the 2016 Rules on the right guaranteed under Article 19(1)(g) is reasonable and thus saved by clause (6) of Article 19.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.