IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
PRATHIBA M.SINGH, MADHU JAIN
Ajay – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
MADHU JAIN, J.
1. The present criminal appeal under Section 415 (2) of Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, (herein afters ‘ BNSS ’) has been preferred by the Appellant assailing the order of conviction dated 26th April, 2025 and the order on sentence dated 6th May, 2025, passed by the ld. Court of Sessions in FIR No. 264/2015, Police Station Subzi Mandi, titledState v. Ajay. The ld. Trial court vide the Impugned Order, has convicted the Appellant for the offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 for the murder of Rakesh, and sentenced to imprisonment for life, along with a fine of Rs.1,000/- with a default sentence of simple imprisonment for two months. The Appellant has been granted the benefit of Section 428 The Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (herein after CrPC).
“12. In view of facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of the Ld. Amicus Curie for convict and Ld. Addl. PP for the State, convict namely Ajay is hereby sentenced to undergoimprisonment for life with fine of Rs. 1,000/- for the offence punishable under Section 302 IPC for commission of murder of deceased Rakesh. In case of default to pay fine, the convict shall undergo


The court distinguished between murder and culpable homicide, ruling that the appellant's act was committed in the heat of passion without premeditation, thus constituting culpable homicide not amoun....
(1) Ordinarily, a witness cannot be expected to recall accurately sequence of events which take place in rapid succession or in a short time span – Presence of an injured eye-witness at the time and ....
The court ruled that the actions of the appellants amounted to culpable homicide not amounting to murder, reducing their conviction from Section 302 to Section 304 Part II IPC due to lack of intent.
The distinction between murder and culpable homicide hinges on the accused's intention, with sudden provocation potentially reducing the charge from murder to culpable homicide not amounting to murde....
The distinction between murder and culpable homicide hinges on intention and circumstances, with the court applying Exception-4 of Section 300 IPC in cases of sudden quarrel.
The main legal point established in the given judgment is that the appellant's act was committed on the spur of the moment, without premeditation, and without taking undue advantage or acting in a cr....
The court affirmed the conviction for murder under Section 302 IPC, highlighting that the accused acted with sufficient intent, despite claims of provocation, based on consistent eyewitness testimoni....
Fatal blow inflicted on head of victim with great force will constitute offence of murder.
The court distinguished between murder and culpable homicide, concluding that the absence of intent to kill warranted a conviction under Section 304 Part-I instead of Section 302.
Unintentional homicide is not murder under Section 302 of IPC.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.