Back
LANUSUNGKUM JAMIR, KARDAK ETE
Arup Das @ Kalamani Barpeta – Appellant
Versus
State Of Assam GHC, GHY – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts of the murder case (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. arguments presented by the defense (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. prosecution's evidence and witness accounts (Para 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 4. the court evaluated the evidence and witness credibility. (Para 18 , 19 , 36) |
| 5. credibility and relevance of witness testimonies (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 6. the legal interpretation of intent and culpability was analyzed. (Para 37) |
| 7. legal definitions and interpretations of culpable homicide vs murder (Para 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43) |
| 8. final judgment and affirmation of the trial court's decision (Para 46 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51) |
Heard Ms. M. Barman, learned Amicus Curiae. Also heard Ms. B. Bhuyan, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam appearing for the State respondent.
2. This Criminal Appeal is preferred by the appellant Sri Arup Das @ Kalamani, from Jail, assailing the judgment and order dated 31.10.2017, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Bajali at Pathsala in Sessions Case No.317/2016, under Section 302 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE , 1860, whereby the appellant has been convicted and sentenced to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for l
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
