SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Del) 169

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
MINI PUSHKARNA, J.
Juhi Mishra - Petitioner
Versus 
State Of Nct And Ors. - Respondents
TEST.CAS. 65 of 2018, I.A. 4344 of 2025
Decided On : 11-02-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Ms. Amisha Ray, Mr. Rohan Rai, Advocates
For the Respondent:Mr. Abhishek Awasthi, Advocate

Natural heirs can be exempted from furnishing surety bonds in administration matters when there is no contest, supporting the need for judicial discretion based on the specifics of each case.

Headnote:(A) Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Section 375 - Application for exemption from filing surety bond in Letters of Administration - The applicant is both the executor and beneficiary under a contested will, with other beneficiaries providing no objection to the relief sought - Court discretion to exempt from surety when there is no contest among legal heirs involved in estate administration is affirmed - Application granted. (Paras 1, 4, 6, 19, 21)

(B) Surety Bond - Requirement for filing surety is discretionary - Courts can exempt natural heirs from furnishing surety bonds depending on the facts of the case without a mechanical approach, especially when other heirs provide their no objection. (Paras 16, 17, 19)

Table of Content
1. application for correction regarding court fees. (Para 1)
2. petitioner satisfies court fee requirements and seeks exemption. (Para 2 , 3)
3. petitioner as executor and beneficiary of the will. (Para 4 , 5)
4. no contest from other beneficiaries regarding exemption request. (Para 6 , 7)
5. confirmation of no objection to exemption from surety. (Para 8 , 9)
6. details on surety value and court observations. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)
7. legal principles regarding exemption from furnishing surety bonds. (Para 15 , 16 , 17)
8. court's considerations and conclusion on exemption request. (Para 18 , 19)
9. court's final order granting exemption. (Para 21 , 22)

JUDGMENT :

MINI PUSHKARNA, J.

I.A. 4344/2025

1. The present application has been filed with the following prayers:

"a. Direct the Registry to do correction in the letter dated 28.01.2025 w.r.t the court fee amount and the correct one is Rs. 5,32,553.28/-;

b. To accept the surety property valued at Rs. 80,81,280/- along with Administrative Bond and court fees annexed with the Application and issue letter of probate/administration;

c. Exempt the Applicant from filing surety to the extent of her share in the suit property, which is amounting to Rs.90,63,832/- and;

d. Pass such other order(s) as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice."

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as far as prayers (a) and (b) are concerned, the same already stand satisfied and the corrected Court Fees after calculation has already been deposited before this Court, as recorded in the order dated 20th January, 2026. The order dated 20th January, 2026 reads as under:

"I.A. 4344/2025 (For correction in Court fees calculation exemption from furnishing surety amount of the administrator/applicant to the extent of her share and to take on record the Court fees, Administrative Bond and surety)

As per the report of the registry, Court fee amount to Rs. 5,32,553/- is correct as per the valuations received on record.

Learned counsel for petitioner has handed over the physical copy of the E-Court Fee across the board. The same is taken on record.

Qua the relief "exemption from furnishing surety amount of the administrator/applicant to the extent of her share" which is not within the jurisdiction of this Court, let the matter be placed before the Hon’ble Court on 10.02.2026."

(Emphasis Supplied)

3. Thus, the present application has been listed today, with regard to the prayer to exempt the petitioner herein from filing surety to the extent of her share in the suit property, amounting to Rs. 90,63,832/-.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is executor of the Will dated 06th April, 2012, and is also a beneficiary of the said Will, wherein, Flat No. 193, Vishwas Apartments, Plot No. 6A, Sector 23, Dwarka, New Delhi – 110075, as well as Flat No. 202, Shanti Niwas Apartment, Dhirachak, Anisabad, Patna – 800002, have been bequeathed in favour of the petitioner.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner draws the attention of this Court to the order dated 03rd May, 2024 passed by this Court, whereby, the Letter of Administration was granted in favour of the petitioner. She, in particular, draws the attention of this Court to paragraph 17 of the said order, which reads as under:

"xxx xxx xxx

17. The Petition is not contested by the Respondents, the other legal heirs of the deceased. Respondent No. 2 to 8 are beneficiaries under the Will and have given their No-objection/consent by way of Affidavits. Also, no third person has filed any objection pursuant to the citation in the Newspapers.

xxxxxxxxx"

6. By referring to the aforesaid order dated 03rd May, 2024, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present petition has not been contested by the respondent nos. 2 to 8, who are the other legal heirs of the deceased and the beneficiaries under the Will dated 06th April, 2012.

7. Attention of this Court has also been drawn to the order dated 26th May, 2025,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top