Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
SACHIN DATTA
Ravi Prakash Mehrotra – Appellant
Versus
Delhi Development Authority Through The Vice Chairman – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of petitioner's engagement (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 2. petitioner's attempts at resolution (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 3. dda's opposition to petitioner's claims (Para 15 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 4. dda's arguments on fees and contract (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 5. court's findings on petitioner's engagement (Para 30 , 31 , 33 , 34 , 38) |
| 6. court's observations on service rendered (Para 39 , 40 , 42 , 45) |
| 7. court's dismay at dda’s conduct (Para 52 , 53 , 54) |
| 8. final order on payment and interest (Para 55 , 56 , 57) |
JUDGMENT :
SACHIN DATTA, J.
1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner, who is an Advocate, seeking appropriate directions against the respondents, to clear his outstanding professional fee bills. The prayers, as framed in the present petition, are as under:-
“a. issue an appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS, directing Respondent nos. 1 and 2 to settle the outstanding professional fee bills of the Petitioner, forthwith, and to compensate him with grant of interest for the inordinate delay and harassment caused;
b. pass any other order as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the interest of e
The Court emphasized that public authorities must honor payment obligations to legal representatives, rejecting claims of non-agreement on fees where precedent payments were made, and affirmed the ma....
Every Advocate, who is rendering Legal provisional Services to the State and its instrumentalities in the capacity of Advocate-General, Additional Advocate-General, Law Officer and Standing Counsel, ....
Government pleader entitled to certified legal fees despite administrative delay; mandamus issued for payment.
Claims for unpaid legal fees by an Advocate must be pursued in civil courts, and attempts to halt legal proceedings over fee disputes violate the ethics and dignity of the profession.
An allegation of collusion must be specifically averred with details and proved. Although it is apparent that the defendant no. 2 admitted to the claim made by the plaintiff, the evidence led by the ....
The court ruled that a panel advocate is entitled to professional fees for all cases where they were authorized to represent the Gaon Sabha, regardless of the nature of the cases.
The court reaffirmed that the authority to question the representation of a society lies within civil proceedings, and recurrent petitions that reiterate previously dismissed issues constitute misuse....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
