Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
SAURABH BANERJEE
Twinkle Vinayak – Appellant
Versus
Vishal Verma – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court allows exemption applications. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. mother seeks permission to travel; case background. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 12) |
| 3. mother's educational pursuits and welfare of child. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 21) |
| 4. father opposes the application; welfare considerations. (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 5. court's considerations on welfare and autonomy. (Para 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42) |
| 6. precedents and court's decision on travel permission. (Para 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47) |
| 7. court modifies visitation rights. (Para 48 , 49 , 50) |
| 8. application disposed; travel permission granted. (Para 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56) |
JUDGMENT :
SAURABH BANERJEE, J.
CM APPL. 62853/2025 (for exemption) and CM APPL.67411/2025 (for exemption)
1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
2. The applications are disposed of.
CM APPL. 62852/2025 (By petitioner for additional documents) and CM APPL.67410/2025 (By petitioner for additional documents
3. By virtue of the present applications under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, [Hereinafter “CPC], the petitioner/mother seeks to place on record certain additional docume
The court affirmed that while the welfare of the child is paramount, a mother’s right to personal development and education is also essential, especially where no demonstrated harm to the child exist....
(1) Rights of parents are irrelevant when a Court decides custody issue. It is not a consideration at all for deciding the issue.(2) A parent has to be given an option to go abroad with child – It ul....
An undertrial or a juvenile in conflict with the law does not have any Fundamental Right or Statutory Right to higher education abroad. However, the right to travel abroad, although a valuable and ba....
Parental abduction undermines custody orders; courts prioritize the child's welfare over legal contingencies.
The welfare of the child is paramount; unilateral decisions by one parent cannot deprive the child of the other's company or rights in their country of citizenship.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
