IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
TEJAS KARIA, J.
Innocenti Sa - Appellant
Versus
Examiner Of Trademarks & Anr. - Respondents
C.A.(COMM.IPD-TM) 76 of 2024, I.A. 45128 of 2024&I.A., 45132 of 2024, W.P.(C)-IPD 54 of 2025, CM 223 of 2025 & CM 224 of 2025, W.P.(C)-IPD 56 of 2025, CM 232 of 2025 & CM 233 of 2025
Decided On : 31-01-2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the case filings and parties involved (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. historical facts regarding trade mark ownership (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 3. arguments presented by both parties regarding trade mark applications (Para 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 4. court's analysis of legal provisions on trade mark acceptance (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30) |
| 5. final ruling on the trade mark applications and direction for further proceedings (Para 56 , 57 , 58) |
JUDGEMENT :
TEJAS KARIA, J.
1. By way of this common Judgement, C.A.(COMM.IPD-TM) 76/2024 (“Appeal”), W.P.(C)-IPD 54/2025 (“WP 54”) and W.P.(C)-IPD 56/2025 (“WP 56”) are decided in terms of the agreement between the Parties as recorded in order dated 16.10.2025.
2. The Appeal has been filed by Innocenti SA (“Innocenti”) against the order dated 28.05.2024 (“Impugned Order”) passed by the Registrar of Trade Marks refusing the registration of the Trade Mark,

3. WP 54 has been filed by August Ventures Private Limited (“August Ventures”) seeking writ of mandamus against the Registrar of Trade Marks to consider and decide the Applications filed by August Ventures under Section 19 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 (“Act”) in Trade Mark Application Nos. 5628002 and 5628003 filed by Innocenti.
4. WP 56 has been filed by August Ventures seeking writ of certiorari quashing the Acceptance Orders dated 30.05.2025 and 23.06.2025 (“Acceptance Orders”) and consequent advertisements dated 09.06.2025 for Application No. 5628002 and dated 07.07.2025 for Application No. 5628003 filed by Innocenti in the Trade Marks Journal. It is also prayed to direct the Registrar of Trade Marks (“Registrar”) to bear in mind and consider the registrations and applications of August Ventures while conducting examination under Rule 33 and 34 of the Trade Marks Rules, 2017 (“Rules”) and before granting acceptance and directing advertisement under Section 20 of the Act, whenever any applications consisting of the word, ‘LAMBRETTA’ are filed or come up for examination.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND:
5. In the year 1932, Innocenti Societa Generale per 1’Industria Metallurgica e Meccanica SPA (“Innocenti SG”) was incorporated in Italy, and engaged in the business of designing, making, and selling motor scooters and parts thereof under the Name Mark, ‘LAMBRETTA’ and, thereafter, on 18.11.1948, Innocenti SG obtained Italian Trade Mark Registration No. 83425 for the word, ‘LAMBRETTA’ for vehicles in Class 12, which was renewed periodically. On 02.06.1949, Innocenti SG obtained Indian Trade Mark registration of the Mark, ‘LAMBRETTA’ for motor vehicles in Class 12.
6. On 16.06.1972, by a tripartite agreement amongst (i) Government of India acting through the President of India; (ii) Automobile Products of India Limited (“API”) and (iii) Innocenti SG (which had become Gepar SPA in 1972) together with Innocenti Lambretta S.P.A. (which merged with Gepar SPA on 29.12.1972), Government of India purchased machinery, know-how, and rights in the Trade Mark, ‘LAMBRETTA’.
7. The President of India assigned the aforesaid assets and rights to Scooters India Limited (“SIL”) in 1972, which became the proprietor of the Trade Mark, ‘LAMBRETTA’.
8. During the years 1992 to 2000, SIL was declared sick by the Board of Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (“BIFR”) in terms of the provisions of Section 3(1)(0) of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985. Subsequently, SIL was declared no longer sick in the year 2000.
9. In 2007, Brandconcern B.V. (“Brandconcern”) filed Trade Marks Applications attempting to illegally usurp the brand, ‘LAMBRETTA’.
10. During the years 2010 to 2015, SIL, was again declared sick and put under BIFR until the year 2015 and the use of the Trade Mark, ‘LAMBRETT’ continued worldwide through the licensees, and such use by the licensees belonged to SIL.
11. In the year 2015, Heritage Licensing SA changed its name to Innocenti SA.
12. On 05.09.2022, August Ventures









The Registrar must consistently apply relevant laws in trademark registration, ensuring procedural compliance, and cannot ignore third-party rights under the Trade Marks Act, allowing for comprehensi....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of exhausting alternative remedies provided by the Trade Marks Act before seeking relief under Article 226 of the Constitution of In....
Writ petitions challenging trademark registration procedures must ensure procedural fairness, including issuance of notice and opportunity for affected parties to respond.
The court established that Senior Examiners can exercise quasi-judicial powers to reject Trade Mark applications if duly authorized, and must provide reasoned orders in compliance with statutory requ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation of Section 36E(5) of the Trade Marks Act, emphasizing that the deeming provision is applicable only when no opposition has been ....
Section 20 of Trade Marks Act, 1999 provides for advertisement of an application, either after acceptance or before acceptance, so as to afford an opportunity to the public, to oppose the registratio....
The Registrar of Trade Marks cannot condone delay in review applications beyond the period prescribed by Trade Marks Rules, affirming adherence to statutory timelines.
A trade mark recognized as well-known under the Trade Marks Act is protected against concurrent use by others regardless of the class of goods, particularly when evidence of rightful prior use and bo....
The court established that under Section 124 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, a civil suit must be stayed if a rectification application regarding trademark validity is pending.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.