JASBIR SINGH, DEV RAJ, PADMA PANDEY
Sudhir Kumar Mittal – Appellant
Versus
Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent
Padma Pandey, Member—The brief facts of the case are that the complainant booked a residential plot No.216, measuring 250.59 sq. yds. approx. (@Rs.23,000/- per square yard, basic sale price) for an amount of Rs.57,63,570/- alongwith certain other payments towards External Development Charges, Internal Development Charges and IFMS with the Opposite Party, in its project namely “Ireo Hamlet Project”, Sector 98, SAS Nagar, Mohali. Thus, the total sale price of the plot, in question, became Rs.63,58,650/-. After the Opposite Party allotted the plot to the complainant, an Agreement dated 26.08.2011 was executed between the parties (Annexure C-1). It was further stated that the complainant deposited the total amount of Rs.53,55,471.66 in respect of the plot/unit, in question. It was further stated that as per Clause 11.1 of the Agreement, possession of the plot was to be delivered to the complainant within a period of 24 months from the date of execution of the Agreement. It was further stated that even if the Opposite Party was to be given benefit of Clause 11.3 of the Agreement, still after availing the grace period and extended delay period, the Opposite Party was bound to ha
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.