Ajit Agrawal VS Wave Megacity Centre Pvt. Ltd.

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

RAM SURAT RAM MAURYA
Ajit Agrawal – Appellant
Versus
Wave Megacity Centre Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent

Counsel for the Parties:
For the Complainant:Ms. Sumati Sharma, Advocate
For the Opp. Party:Mr. Sumeer Sodhi, Mr. Arjun Nanda and Ms. Riddhima Juneja, Advocates

ORDER

Ram Surat Ram Maurya, Presiding Member.—Heard Ms. Sumati Sharma, Advocate, for the complainant and Mr. Sumeer Sodhi, Advocate, for the opposite party.

2. Aforementioned complaint has been filed for directing the opposite party, (hereinafter referred to as the builder) (i) to return the money paid by the complainant, amounting to Rs.9620862.40 along with interest @18% per annum, (ii) to cancel “Allottee Arrangement Agreement” dated 19.07.2012, (iii) to pay Rs.50/- lacs as compensation for mental agony and physical harassment (iv) to pay Rs.2/- lacs as cost of the litigation and (v) any other relief which may be deemed fit and proper, in the facts of the case, be passed.

3. The facts, as stated in the complaint and emerged from the documents attached with it, are that the builder was a company, engaged in the business of development and construction of residential and commercial buildings and selling its unit to the prospective buyers. In the year 2011, the builder propagated that they had licence for development in commercial plot No. CC-001, admeasuring 618952.75 square meters, at Sector-52A & 32, NOIDA, Gautam Budh Nagar. The builder launched a project of Super Premium/Servi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document