RAM SURAT RAM MAURYA
Hakim Singh – Appellant
Versus
Raghuveer Singh – Respondent
ORDER
Ram Surat Ram Maurya, Presiding Member.—Heard Mr. Praveen Mahajan, Advocate, for the petitioner.
2. Aforementioned revision has been filed from the order of State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Uttar Pradesh dated 02.08.2018, passed in First Appeal No.794 of 2017 (arising out of order of District Consumer Forum, Agra, dated 06.04.2017, passed in CC/243/2007) whereby the complaint was allowed with cost of Rs.5000/- and the petitioner was directed to pay Rs.219900/- with interest @6% per annum from the date of filing of the complaint till the date of payment and the appeal of the petitioner has been dismissed.
3. Raghuveer Singh (the respondent) filed CC/243/2017, for directing Maa Sidhidatri Sheet Grih (the petitioner) (i) to pay Rs.508600/-, for misappropriation of his potatoes stored in cold storage of the petitioner.
4. The complainant stated that he had stored 733 sacks potatoes (each sack contained 50 kg. potatoes), in the cold storage of the petitioner on 30.03.2007, 02.04.2007, 04.04.2007, 05.04.2007, for which, the petitioner had issued receipts Nos.1312, 1330, 1333, 1380, 1455 and 11384. When the complainant went to take back his potatoes on 18.10.2007, then
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.