SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

R.K.AGRAWAL
Arihant Superstructures Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Pushpa Agarwal – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Mr. Arpit Gupta, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Dhruv Gupta, Advocate

1ORDER

R.K. Agrawal, President.—This Appeal has been filed by Arihant Superstructures Ltd., under Section 51 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”), challenging the Order dated 13.09.2021, passed by the Rajasthan State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Circuit Bench at Jodhpur in Consumer Complaint No. 9 of 2017, whereby the State Commission has allowed the Complaint and directed the Appellant herein to refund the amount of Rs.26,80,340/- along with interest @ 9% per annum as also the compensation of Rs.,1,00,000/- for mental agony and litigation cost of Rs.10,000/-.

2. The relevant facts leading to the present First Appeal are that the Complainant/ Respondent herein, on 21.10.2012 had booked a Flat No. Belita-702, admeasuring 1090 sq. ft. in “Arihant Adita”, the project of the Opposite Party/ Appellant herein. Thereafter, on 07.11.2012, the Agreement for Sale was executed between the Appellant and the Respondent for the aforesaid Flat for a total sale consideration of Rs.26,00,000/-. Vide Letter dated 19.11.2012, the Appellant informed the Respondent that the Construction will be completed by 31.07.2014, and Completion Certificate will be

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top