Back
DINESH SINGH
Aparajith Bhandary – Appellant
Versus
Sunny Brooks (Now Samarkhand Property Mgt. Pvt. Ltd. ) – Respondent
ORDER
These revision petitions (09 nos.) have been filed before this Commission under section 21(b) of the Act 1986 in challenge to the Order dated 07.04.2017 of the State Commission in revision petitions no. 46 to no. 56 of 2014 and no. 06 to no. 11 of 2015 arising out of the common Orders dated 18.09.2014 and dated 26.12.2014 of the District Commission in execution petitions no. 117, no. 118, no. 120, no. 122 to no. 124, no. 36, no. 19, no. 115, no. 116, no. 119, no. 18, no. 43, no. 121 and no. 196 of 2008 and no. 171 and no. 172 of 2013.
2. Learned proxy counsel present on behalf of the revisionists requests for an adjournment, submitting that the learned counsel is not available. Learned counsel for the respondent is present, and submits that he has come from Bangaluru for the final hearing.
3. These revisions are pending since 2017. It is deemed appropriate to dispose them on the basis of the record and after hearing the counsel present i.e. the learned counsel for the respondent. The request for adjournment made by the learned proxy counsel on behalf of the revisionists is politely declined.
4. The record, including inter alia the impugned Order dated 07.04.2017 of the State C
(1) ‘Appeal’ against an Order passed under section 27 - ‘appeal’ against an Order passed under section 27 by the District Commission does lie before the State Commission under section 27A.(2) Revisio....
Revisional jurisdiction under Section 17(1)(b) of the Act 1986 pertains exclusively to consumer disputes, not execution proceedings.
No revision petition against the order passed in appeal filed under section 27-A of Act is maintainable before national commission.
The court ruled that execution proceedings under the Consumer Protection Act must follow statutory appeal routes, and revisional jurisdiction under Article 227 is not applicable.
The Consumer Protection Act, 2019, delineates the distinct roles of revisions and appeals, with revisions not applicable to final orders of the District Forum, which must be appealed under Section 41....
(1) Assess and re-appreciate the evidence - Commission in exercise of its revisional jurisdiction under section 21 of the Act is not required to re-assess and re-appreciate the evidence on record and....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
