Back
SUBHASH CHANDRA
Indore Development Authority – Appellant
Versus
Urmila Singh – Respondent
ORDER
Subhash Chandra, Presiding Member—This revision petition filed under section 21 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (in short, the ‘Act’) assails the order of the Madhya Pradesh State Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission, Bhopal (in short, ‘State Commission’) in First Appeal No. 1677 of 2008 and First Appeal No.1921 of 2008 which were dismissed by a common order dated 27.02.2013. These appeals were filed against the order dated 09.05.2008 of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Indore (in short, ‘District Forum’) in Consumer Complaint No. 968 of 2006.
2. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner, a statutory Planning Authority under the MP Town and Country Planning Act, 1973 entered into an agreement with respondent no. 2 in 1986 to provide residential plots to members of the respondent society on being certified by the Joint Registrar of Cooperative Societies upon payment of requisite rates/charges. Respondent no 1 filed a complaint before the District Forum alleging that having been a member since 1983, she had deposited Rs 2,16,000/- with respondent no. 2 for a plot which had not been done and therefore amounted to deficiency in service. The petition
(1) Assess and re-appreciate the evidence - Commission in exercise of its revisional jurisdiction under section 21 of the Act is not required to re-assess and re-appreciate the evidence on record and....
No revision petition against the order passed in appeal filed under section 27-A of Act is maintainable before national commission.
Revisional jurisdiction - Where two interpretations of evidence are possible, concurrent findings based on evidence have to be accepted and such findings cannot be substituted in revisional jurisdict....
(1) National Commission – The powers of the National Commission are very limited.(2) Revisional jurisdiction – Only in a case where it is found that the State Commission has exercised its jurisdictio....
(1) CPC – It is pertinent to note that, S.13(4) of the old Act as well as S.38(9) of the new Act does not have any mention as to the applicability of S.9A of the C.P.Code to the proceedings before th....
The Consumer Protection Act, 2019, delineates the distinct roles of revisions and appeals, with revisions not applicable to final orders of the District Forum, which must be appealed under Section 41....
“Change in layout plan of a housing scheme without intimation to allottees amounts to deficiency in service.”
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
