K. Venkata Rao VS Kotak Mahindra Prime Ltd.

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

SUBHASH CHANDRA
K. Venkata Rao – Appellant
Versus
Kotak Mahindra Prime Ltd. – Respondent

Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner: In Person
For the Respondent:Mr. Ananay Chopra, Proxy Counsel for Mr. Sundeep Srivastava, Advocate and Mr. Anis Chopra, Manager
For the Respondent: None for R-2 and 3

ORDER

Subhash Chandra, Presiding Member—This revision petition filed under section 21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (in short, the ‘Act’) assails the order dated 04.04.2019 of the Karnataka State Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission, Bangalore (in short, ‘State Commission’) in Appeal No. 469 of 2017 dismissing the appeal against the order of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Bengaluru (in short, ‘District Forum’) in Consumer Complaint No. 720 of 2014 dated 18.01.2017.

2. The brief facts of the case as per the revision petitioner are that he had purchased a used Toyota car bearing registration number TN 37 AV 4500 from Anaamalais Toyota, Coimbatore for which he obtained a loan of Rs. 5,00,000/- from the respondent. He had filed Consumer Complaint No. 90 of 2012 before the District Forum, Coimbatore alleging excessive amount claimed/recovered by the respondents which came to be allowed. He thereafter filed another consumer complaint before the District Forum, Bangalore (No. 720/2017) on the ground that the cause of action was a letter issued by the Bangalore branch office of respondent no.1. This complaint was dismissed with costs of Rs 5,000/- on the ground

Click Here to Read the rest of this document