SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

C. VISWANATH, SUBHASH CHANDRA
Sub Post Master – Appellant
Versus
Dipti Das – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioners:Mr. Ramneek Mishra, Advocate
For the Respondents:Soumya Dutta, Advocate

ORDER

Subhash Chandra, Member—This revision petition is filed under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (in short, the ‘Act’) assails the order of the State Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission, Kolkata, West Bengal (in short, ‘State Commission’) in First Appeal No. A/1389/2014 dated 06.12.2016 arising out of order dated 17.09.2014 in complaint no. 67/2013 of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Burdwan (in short, ‘District Forum’). This order disposes off revision petitions in RP Nos.09, 10, 11, 12 and 13 of 2018 which arise from a similar grievance and the same order of the State Commission.

2. Respondents are holders of Monthly Income Scheme (MIS) accounts promoted by the Post Office in the Burnpur Market Sub Post Office, District Burdwan, West Bengal and had approached the District Forum alleging deficiency in service on the ground that interest was not being remitted to their accounts. The petitioner herein had contested the complaint on the ground that the accounts had been opened by the complainants through the agency of someone who was not an authorised agent of the Post Office and that the MIS accounts were therefore fake placing no liability on the Post Off

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top