RAM SURAT RAM MAURYA
Pervez Amin – Appellant
Versus
Kanpur Development Authority (KDA) – Respondent
ORDER
Heard Ms. Priyanka Sinha, Advocate, for the complainants and Mr. Abhishek Chaudhary, Advocate, for the opposite party.
2. 48 flat buyers have filed above complaint, as a representative case, for directing the opposite party to (i) handover possession of the flats to the complainants, complete in all respect as per specifications, forthwith, (ii) not to demand any amount other than as indicated in Brochure, (iii) to remove deficiency in construction in respect of use of marble and aluminium sink, (iv) to pay Rs.8000/-, per month as rent from due date of possession till delivery of actual possession, (v) to pay exemplary damage for mental agony and harassment, (vi) to pay compensation for delay in handing over possession, (vii) to pay the costs of litigation; and (viii) any other relief which may be deemed fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case. IA/1/2012 and IA/15414/2018 were allowed and permission to sue as a class action case under Section 12(1)(c) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 was granted, vide order dated 09.11.2020. RA/189/2020, for review of order dated 09.11.2020 was rejected on 12.01.2021.
3. The complainants stated that Kanpur Development Au
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.